Revelation 2:18-29 – the Church at Thyatira

Here are my notes for tomorrow’s Sunday School lesson. Since I know that many will be trapped indoors due to snow, I thought posting them early might be helpful.

PJW

To the Church in Thyatira

Thyatira was a city in a valley – a central hub of communications in its day. It sat on the bank of the Lycus River, which was a main tributary of the Hermus Valley in which the city was situated. Thyatira was built between 300 and 282 VC by Seleucus I, who was the founder of the Seleucid dynasty.[i] Initially it was built as defense against a colony of Macedonian soldiers in case they tried to invade Pergamum.

Its placement was strategic, as Ramsey suggests:

Not merely did all communication and trade between those two great and rich valleys (the Hermus and Caicos) pass up and down the vale; but also, in certain periods and in certain conditions of the general economy of Asia Minor and the Aegean lands, a main artery of the Anatolian system of communication made use of it. The land-road connecting Constantinople with Smyrna and the south-western regions of Asia Minor goes that way, and has been at some periods an important route. The Imperial Post-road took that course in Roman times. Above all, when Pergamum was the capital of Asia under the kings, that was the most important road in the whole country…[ii]

2:18 “And to the angel of the church in Thyatira write: ‘The words of the Son of God, who has eyes like a flame of fire, and whose feet are like burnished bronze.

Jesus refers to Himself as the Son of God here, asserts plainly His deity, and therefore His authority. There can be no question in the minds of those receiving this letter whom is it that is addressing them. His eyes and his feet are describes in ways that we’ve looked at previously, and are taken from Daniel 10…

His body was like beryl, his face like the appearance of lightning, his eyes like flaming torches, his arms and legs like the gleam of burnished bronze, and the sound of his words like the sound of a multitude. (Daniel 10:6)

These are attributes of the divine Judge. And, as Beale remarks, they anticipate (or tie in well with) the words of the Messianic Psalm 2:

Kiss the Son, lest he be angry, and you perish in the way, for his wrath is quickly kindled. Blessed are all who take refuge in him. (Psalm 2:12)

What this means is that at the end of the day – at the end of all time – Jesus will be the just and righteous judge because 1. He knows everything, all the circumstances surrounding your life He knows perfectly, and 2. He has the authority and strength to execute judgment with the power of his “arms and legs” as they are depicted in a “gleam of burnished bronze.”

2:19 “‘I know your works, your love and faith and service and patient endurance, and that your latter works exceed the first.

This leads Jesus to give them a commendation – that they have loved others and been faithful. Their witness in the world has been good. Furthermore they have been patiently enduring for Christ. In fact they have persevered in the faith – their latter works exceeding even those that they did at first. I assume this means that they had been growing in Christ.

2:20 But I have this against you, that you tolerate that woman Jezebel, who calls herself a prophetess and is teaching and seducing my servants to practice sexual immorality and to eat food sacrificed to idols.

Now He addresses the issue. Like those in Pergamum, they are giving “free reign to a group of false teachers.”[iii]

The result of this has been that many have been seduced. The cause seems to be from a woman Jesus calls “Jezebel.” It is possible that this is a particular person, though I’ve always leaned toward it being a more symbolic reference to the woman who “incited King Ahab and Israel to compromise and ‘fornicate’ by worshiping Baal (1 Kings 16:31; 21:25 cf. Beale).”

Beale remarks of the similarities between John’s writing style here and in 2 John 1:

Possibly the reference is to only one individual false teacher, who could be a woman. However, the reference to ‘the woman’ and ‘her children’ (2:23) evokes the phrase ‘to the elect lady and her children in 2 John 1, which in its context refers respectively to the community as a whole and to the individuals who compose the community (likewise 1 Peter 5:13 and female personifications of Israel in the OT and of the church in the NT).[iv]

Therefore the issue is that the people here in Thyatira have been led astray, and it seems that the false teachers are really flourishing. It is so easy sometimes to be caught up in false teaching. Sometimes the immature Christian can easily cling to that which tastes as sweet as honey, only to later have it turn to ash in their mouths.

This is especially why we have decried the false Gospel preachers like Joel Olsteen, and those who get major things wrong in their teaching, such as Joyce Meyer. These people have led many astray – not because the people are stupid, but because they have clung to untruths without testing them.

That is why the men and women of Berea were called “noble” by Paul for searching the scriptures to test whether his message aligned with what the OT had to say. More than simply living on feelings, we must test every form of doctrine by the Word of God.

2:21 I gave her time to repent, but she refuses to repent of her sexual immorality. [22] Behold, I will throw her onto a sickbed, and those who commit adultery with her I will throw into great tribulation, unless they repent of her works, [23] and I will strike her children dead. And all the churches will know that I am he who searches mind and heart, and I will give to each of you according to your works.

I mentioned before that Jesus is both all knowing, and able to execute judgment in power and authority. He is therefore a just judge.

Here Jesus says that if this group of people doesn’t repent, they will face great tribulation. Notice two things – first that He gave them time to repent, and second that He is the one who will through them onto a “sickbed.”

We sometimes don’t know if we are being punished by the Lord for a sin we’ve committed, and though sometimes trials are sent to refine us (see Hebrews 12), at other times trials are sent to punish us and bring us to repentance.

It can be hard to know which is which, but I find that the rule of thumb ought to be in situations where it seems as though punishment is upon us, that we bow before the Lord who knows all and repent of any sin in our lives.

Yet, as R.C. Sproul notes in an article on suffering, we must never jump to the conclusion immediately that our suffering is the direct result of our sin – God works in mysterious ways. Sproul says:

When we suffer, we must trust that God knows what He is doing, and that He works in and through the pain and afflictions of His people for His glory and for their sanctification. It is hard to endure lengthy suffering, but the difficulty is greatly alleviated when we hear our Lord explaining the mystery in the case of the man born blind, whom God called to many years of pain for Jesus’ glory.[v]

2:24-25 But to the rest of you in Thyatira, who do not hold this teaching, who have not learned what some call the deep things of Satan, to you I say, I do not lay on you any other burden. [25] Only hold fast what you have until I come.

Hendricksen explains what is going on here contextually when Jesus says they are learning “the deep things of Satan”:

She (Jezebel), apparently, argued thus: in order to conquer Satan, you must know him. You will never be able to conquer sin unless you have become thoroughly acquainted with it by experience. In brief, a Christian should learn to know ‘the deep things of Satan.’ By all means attend the guild-feast and commit fornication…and still remain a Christian; nay rather, become a better Christian!

This seems like an easily dismissed illogical idea. Why would anyone engage in wrong doing simply to become a better Christian? Well, the most I got to be thinking about it, the more I realized that in the moment of temptation to sin, we do many things that are illogical.

Furthermore, it is easy to take Paul’s words from 1 Corinthians 9 and completely distort them, as many Christian do for their own selfish gain:

This is my defense to those who would examine me. [4] Do we not have the right to eat and drink? [5] Do we not have the right to take along a believing wife, as do the other apostles and the brothers of the Lord and Cephas? [6] Or is it only Barnabas and I who have no right to refrain from working for a living? [7] Who serves as a soldier at his own expense? Who plants a vineyard without eating any of its fruit? Or who tends a flock without getting some of the milk? (1 Corinthians 9:3-7)

And…

If others share this rightful claim on you, do not we even more? Nevertheless, we have not made use of this right, but we endure anything rather than put an obstacle in the way of the gospel of Christ. (1 Corinthians 9:12)

And…

For though I am free from all, I have made myself a servant to all, that I might win more of them. [20] To the Jews I became as a Jew, in order to win Jews. To those under the law I became as one under the law (though not being myself under the law) that I might win those under the law. [21] To those outside the law I became as one outside the law (not being outside the law of God but under the law of Christ) that I might win those outside the law. [22] To the weak I became weak, that I might win the weak. I have become all things to all people, that by all means I might save some. [23] I do it all for the sake of the gospel, that I may share with them in its blessings. (1 Corinthians 9:19-23)

Note that Paul uses his freedom, not as a way to enhance wealth or personal comfort (2 Cor. 111-12!), but as a means of spreading the gospel. His liberty is never used as an excuse for bad behavior, and he always bears in mind the weaker brother (Romans 14). Furthermore, Paul urges us to keep our bodies under control. As he finishes his discourse in 1 Corinthians 9 he says this:

Do you not know that in a race all the runners run, but only one receives the prize? So run that you may obtain it. [25] Every athlete exercises self-control in all things. They do it to receive a perishable wreath, but we an imperishable. [26] So I do not run aimlessly; I do not box as one beating the air. [27] But I discipline my body and keep it under control, lest after preaching to others I myself should be disqualified. (1 Corinthians 9:24-27)

I just wanted to provide some more biblical thought here because often we fall prey to the false idea that because of our liberty and freedom, we can do anything we want with no consequences. But that is not how the Bible tells us we ought to live. We ought to live in freedom, governed by love for the gospel – not for our own comfort or selfish desires. When we do, we will be less apt to follow every wind of false doctrine (James 1), and crucifying our desires for selfish gain (Romans 6) we will live a life worthy of our Lord.

2:26-27 The one who conquers and who keeps my works until the end, to him I will give authority over the nations, [27] and he will rule them with a rod of iron, as when earthen pots are broken in pieces, even as I myself have received authority from my Father.

Huge theological paragraph here! Major echoes from John 5 and Matthew 28, which helps lay the foundation for our understanding of what Jesus means by “received authority from the Father.” Here are those kingly passages respectively:

Truly, truly, I say to you, whoever hears my word and believes him who sent me has eternal life. He does not come into judgment, but has passed from death to life. [25] “Truly, truly, I say to you, an hour is coming, and is now here, when the dead will hear the voice of the Son of God, and those who hear will live. [26] For as the Father has life in himself, so he has granted the Son also to have life in himself. [27] And he has given him authority to execute judgment, because he is the Son of Man. (John 5:24-27 ESV)

And…

And Jesus came and said to them, “All authority in heaven and on earth has been given to me. (Matthew 28:18)

Now that we’ve remembered these things, I want to point our attention to specifically what Jesus is saying. He is saying two things specifically…

1. Those who conquer and those who “keep” his works until the end are those who are Christians. In other words, those who behave like Christians are His children. In fact, the Christian life is marked not simply by negatives (not doing something, or just the past history of what Christ has done, for example), but by positives.

Francis Schaeffer understood this and spoke of how Paul demonstrated this in Romans 6 as well as in Galatians 2:20, which states:

I have been crucified with Christ. It is no longer I who live, but Christ who lives in me. And the life I now live in the flesh I live by faith in the Son of God, who loved me and gave himself for me. (Galatians 2:20)

The negative grammar here is that “I have been crucified with Christ.” This is the past historical fact. But there’s more to the Christian life than this. That is what Jesus is reminding us here – there is “conquering” to be done. That is why Paul says, “the life I now live in the flesh I live by faith in the Son of God, who loved me and gave himself for me.”

Beale remarks, “It is not just how people die that proves them to be overcomers, but the whole of their Christian lives are to be characterized by ‘overcoming’, which is a process completed at death.”[vi]

And as Schaeffer says, “The Christian negative is not a nihilist negative; there is a true biblical negative. There is a true life in the present as well as in the future.” And commenting on Romans 6, he states, “So we died with Christ, but we rose with Christ. That is the emphasis. Christ’s death is an historic fact in the past and we will be raised from the dead in future history; but there is to be a positive exhibition in present history, now, before our future resurrection.”[vii]

2. Jesus is saying that we will share in His reign.

For He states that those who conquer will rule the nations with Christ. The fact that our reign will be shared with Jesus is expressed in terms that we’re familiar with as they pertain to Christ’s own rule. For it says the one who conquers, “will rule them with a rod of iron, as when earthen pots are broken in pieces, even as I myself have received authority from my Father.”

Let’s go back to Psalm 2 now once again. That messianic psalm says this:

I will tell of the decree: The LORD said to me, “You are my Son; today I have begotten you. [8] Ask of me, and I will make the nations your heritage, and the ends of the earth your possession. [9] You shall break them with a rod of iron and dash them in pieces like a potter’s vessel.” (Psalm 2:7-9)

Here it is Jesus, the “Son of Man”, who will rule the nations with a rod of iron. Jesus is telling us that we will share in this reign – by nature of adoption (Romans 8).

This is simply an astounding promise, and one which Jesus had already laid the foundation for in chapter one:

…and from Jesus Christ the faithful witness, the firstborn of the dead, and the ruler of kings on earth. To him who loves us and has freed us from our sins by his blood [6] and made us a kingdom, priests to his God and Father, to him be glory and dominion forever and ever. Amen. (Revelation 1:5-6)

Ladd sums up the situation:

The effective establishment of the Kingdom of God cannot be accomplished apart from the destruction of all hostile and recalcitrant powers. The new age cannot be inaugurated without the displacement of the old, fallen, sinful age with its rebellious hosts. In some way not made clear in the Scripture, the followers of the Messiah are to share in his triumph over the hostile nations.

When I read this it reminded me of the conquering of Canaan in the OT. God used His people along with mighty miracles and acts only He could do (crossing the Red sea and the Jordan, the destruction of Jericho, the Pillar of Fire and Cloud etc.), yet He also used an army of men – this is how He chose to act. To use men to cleanse that land, and leave no one alive who does not acknowledge Jesus as King. It is a picture of what is to come. There will be none who stand against the Lord and His “fellow heirs” (Romans 8). This is something we will see more clearly still as we continue our study.

2:28-29 And I will give him the morning star. [29] He who has an ear, let him hear what the Spirit says to the churches.’

The final promise is that those who conquer, Jesus will give “the morning star.” This undoubtedly is Jesus Himself, our greatest reward and treasure.

I will share a personal thought here. It has long baffled me how people in the church struggle and search the scriptures to learn the nature of the reward we will gain in heaven. The scripture seems to indicate that we will be rewarded in heaven, but that reward when spoken of generally, if very vague. So it has always perplexed men who have sought to understand what those rewards could entail.

I don’t claim to be as wise as those who have taught me, but I would wager that the most important, most wonderful, most significant reward in heaven will be Christ Himself – the great Morning Star.[viii]

In Conclusion…

I will simply leave you with one of the reflections of G.K. Beale who challenges us as follows:

How can we express overcoming through suffering? And how are we to understand teachings that appear to present believers unconditional offers of material blessing in this life for their faithfulness? Sometimes where persecution is not present there is the temptation to compromise in some way (sexually, theologically, financially, etc.) and to not give in to compromise is to “overcome.”

FOOTNOTES

[i] William Ramsay, Letters to the Seven Churches, Pg. 317.

[ii] Ramsay, Pg.’s 316-317.

[iii] Beale, Longer commentary, Pg. 260.

[iv] Beale, Longer Commentary, Pg. 260-261.

[v] Sproul begins the article talking about a time he visited a lady in the hospital who was dying of cancer and feeling that perhaps she was being punished for having an abortion years earlier. The temptation from a pastoral response was to say “no that isn’t what’s going on here”, but Sproul basically said “I don’t know”, because we can never know the secret counsel of the Lord. The article can be found here: http://www.ligonier.org/learn/articles/suffering-and-the-glory-of-god/

[vi] Beale, Longer commentary, Pg. 271.

[vii] Francis Schaeffer, True Spirituality, Pg.’s 15-16.

[viii] Ladd has some troubles with this, but Hendriksen seemed correct to me when he states, “Here again the primary reference is to Christ Himself (Revelation 22:16). As the morning star rules the heavens, so believers will rule with Christ; they will share in His royal splendour (sic) and dominion. The star is always the symbol of royalty, being linked with the sceptre (sic) (Numbers 24:17; cf. Matthew 2:2).” This is the conclusion I came to on my own before reading the commentaries, and perhaps I am wrong, but it reminded me of 2 Peter 1:19 which says, “And we have the prophetic word more fully confirmed, to which you will do well to pay attention as to a lamp shining in a dark place, until the day dawns and the morning star rises in your hearts.” So the passage here in Revelation could mean the coming of the Spirit and/or Christ, or be a reference to Daniel 12: 3 and the “immortality of the righteous” (Mounce, Pg. 107).

 

Study Notes for Revelation 2:12-17 the church @Pergamum

Below are my notes on the letter to the church at Pergamum. I will also note that I’ve included and excursus into the Binding of Satan below which may prove helpful for future reference.

To the Church in Pergamum

Pergamum was the capital of Asia. It has been so for some 250 years before this time (per MacArthur), and had been its own kingdom until about 133 B.C. when its final king died, and he bequeathed his kingdom to the Romans.

Hendricksen gives us some scope to the city of Pergamum:

The city was located upon a huge rocky hill which, as it were, plants its foot upon the great surrounding valley. The Romans made it the capital of the province of Asia…Here were to be seen the many pagan altars and the great altar to Zeus. All these things may have been I the mind of Christ when He called Pergamum the place ‘where Satan dwells.’ Yet, it seems to us that the obvious purpose of the Author is to direct our attention to the fact that Pergamum was the capital of the province and, as such, also the center of emperor-worship.[i]

The city was about 100 miles north of Ephesus and lay 15 miles inland from the Aegean – so it wasn’t a port city like Smyrna and Ephesus. Pliny wrote about how magnificent it was, and MacArthur notes that famous archeologist William Ramsay declared it to be a majestic city sitting atop the gigantic rock formation.

The city boasted a library only second to the famous library of Alexandria, with over 200,000 handwritten volumes. A third century B.C. king of Pergamum even tried to lure the librarian from Alexandria away to run their collection, but the Egyptian king caught wind of it and retaliated by cutting off the export of papyrus to the Asian city!

“Out of necessity, the Pergamenes developed parchment, made of treated animal skins, for use as writing material. Though parchment was actually known from a thousand years earlier in Egypt, the Pergamenes were responsible for its widespread use in the ancient world. In fact, the word parchment may derive from a form of the word Pergamum.[ii]

2:12 “And to the angel of the church in Pergamum write: ‘The words of him who has the sharp two-edged sword.

In chapter one (vs. 16) we see that Jesus is described as the one who had a sword protruding from his mouth. When we discussed this in the class setting, we came to the conclusion that the sword was the word of God. The fact that it emanated from the mouth of Jesus made a great deal of sense in that the inspired Word is that which came from Jesus.

The author of Hebrews, himself inspired by the Spirit, said this:

For the word of God is living and active, sharper than any two-edged sword, piercing to the division of soul and of spirit, of joints and of marrow, and discerning the thoughts and intentions of the heart. [13] And no creature is hidden from his sight, but all are naked and exposed to the eyes of him to whom we must give account. (Hebrews 4:12-13)

Matthew Henry sees the connection here as well and says this:

(1.) The word of God is a sword; it is a weapon both offensive and defensive, it is, in the hand of God, able to slay both sin and sinners. (2.) It is a sharp sword. No heart is so hard but it is able to cut it; it can divide asunder between the soul and the spirit, that is, between the soul and those sinful habits that by custom have become another soul, or seem to be essential to it. (3.) It is a sword with two edges; it turns and cuts every way. There is the edge of the law against the transgressors of that dispensation, and the edge of the gospel against the despisers of that dispensation; there is an edge to make a wound, and an edge to open a festered wound in order to its healing. There is no escaping the edge of this sword: if you turn aside to the right hand, it has an edge on that side; if on the left hand, you fall upon the edge of the sword on that side; it turns every way.

Of course the sharp two-edged sword is familiar to us now. But perhaps equally interesting is how Hebrews describes the all-knowing nature of the Lord. He says, “…no creature is hidden from his sight.” In a similar way we read earlier that Jesus was described as having eyes, “like a flame of fire” (1:14). Those eyes are all-seeing, and, as the writer of Hebrews says, all will be “exposed to the eyes of him to whom we must give account.”

Jesus himself said, “For nothing is hidden that will not be made manifest, nor is anything secret that will not be known and come to light” (Luke 8:17).

I’m pointing this out because, while this is apocalyptic literature, the way in which Jesus is described – his attributes, his authority, and his actions are consistent across the canon of scripture.

2:13 “‘I know where you dwell, where Satan’s throne is. Yet you hold fast my name, and you did not deny my faith even in the days of Antipas my faithful witness, who was killed among you, where Satan dwells.

Here is the commendation of the church at Pergamum. They have held fast the name of Jesus and didn’t deny the faith even in the midst of execution.

Note how Jesus describes their location as “where Satan’s throne is.” And that the result is that Christians – notably this man Antipas – have died on behalf of the name of Jesus. There are two points I want us to understand about this:

Satan’s Driving Motivation

  1. Satan has always sought to kill those people who are the offspring of Eve. He delights in killing the Lord’s elect. For as God said to the devil in Genesis:

The LORD God said to the serpent, “Because you have done this, cursed are you above all livestock and above all beasts of the field; on your belly you shall go, and dust you shall eat all the days of your life. [15] I will put enmity between you and the woman, and between your offspring and her offspring; he shall bruise your head, and you shall bruise his heel.” (Genesis 3:14-15)

Now Jesus has been bruised for us, but He has leveled the fatal blow – the headshot – to Satan. Therefore Satan’s destiny has been set – his power already diminished, and he will soon be permanently cast into outer darkness.

Satan’s Throne and His Power

  1. Satan’s “throne” may be here on earth, but it is not a throne of sovereignty. He “rules” in a subordinate sense, not an ultimate sense. He is roaming the earth seeking those whom he can devour (1 Peter 5:8), but his freedom is subordinate to God’s sovereign power and control. Many people get tripped up on the traditional Amillennial idea that of Satan being bound “bound” from deceiving the nations right now (Revelation 20:3). This is perhaps because they cast their own ideas about what it means to be “bound” onto the Biblical text. They point to all the terrible things going on in the world and to other texts like this where Satan is characterized as ruling in some sense, and they say, “Hey, there’s simply no way he is “bound” right now.”

But perhaps the Amillenial view is closer to the correct view than they might realize, and that we live right now in the millennium. If this is true, then Satan is bound. But how is he bound? He is “bound” from “deceiving the nations.” The Bible never says he is bound from doing evil and working to kill the offspring of Eve! It simply asserts that he no longer has the ability to withstand the unbridled power of the Holy Spirit. Before the in-breaking of the Kingdom of God in the ministry of Jesus, the entire world save a few was characterized by darkness and idol worship. Now the gospel is saving souls and Satan, though powerful and devouring those whom he can, is ultimately unable to tamp out the gospel or keep the world in darkness.

Excursus

Now – a note on this front – I understand the difficulties here with what I’ve said about the nature of Satan being “bound.” Not the least of these difficulties comes from the passage in Revelation 20 itself, namely that Satan is characterized as being thrown in a “pit” which is “shut” so that “he might not deceive the nations” until the millennial period is over. That certainly sounds like a complete cutting off of his freedom!

But here I will lean on greater exegetical minds than my own to explain in much more detail what is going on in this passage. Namely, I want to lean on G.K. Beale’s mind, who has what I consider to be the most clear understanding of the passage, and for the sake of reference in the future I will cite several of his remarks here on the passage in question, Revelation 20:1-6. This may seem to be getting ahead of ourselves a bit, but I believe that the book is a uniform whole. There are concepts throughout the book that I will continually bring up, and I want to explain where my “assumptions” are coming from. I think that putting some of these thoughts to rest early in our study could help us understand the book more clearly as we go along. Here are some of Beale’s exegetical notes:

The “key of the abyss” in 20:1 is similar to the keys in chs. 1, 3, 6 and 9, especially chs. 6 and 9, which all pertain to realities during the church age. The “abyss” in 9:1-2 and 20:1 is probably a synonym for “death and Hades” in 1:18 and 6:8…

As in 6:8 and 9:1-2, so in 20:1-3 the Satanic realm comes under Christ’s authority, which is executed by a mediating angel…

If we have been correct in generally identifying 20:1 with the preceding “key” passages, which concern inter-advent realities, then the binding and the millennium are best understood as Christ’s authority restraining the devil in some manner during the church age.

This means tat the restraint of Satan is a direct result of Christ’s resurrection. If so, the binding, expulsion, and fall of Stan can be seen in other NT passages that affirm with the same terms (“bind”, “cast” etc.) that the decisive defeat of the devil occurred at Christ’s death and resurrection (Matt. 12:29; Mark 3:27; Luke 10:17-10; John 12:31-33; Col. 2:15; Heb. 2:14). More precisely, the binding was probably inaugurated during Christ’s ministry, which is more the focus of texts such as Matthew 12:29, Mark 3:27, and Luke 10:17-19. Satan’s binding was climatically put in motion immediately after Christ’s resurrection, and it lasts throughout most of the age between Christ’s first and second comings.

But now what about the nature of the binding? How is this defined etc.?

Many commentators conclude that the metaphors of verses 1-3 (in ch. 20) refer to al complete cessation of the devil’s influence on earth, sometimes basing this on such texts as 2 Cor. 4:3-4, 11:14; Eph. 2:2; 2 Tim. 2:26; and 1 Peter 5:8. But the “binding of Satan in Mark 3:27 (= Matt. 12:29) does not restrict all his activities but highlights the fact that Jesus is sovereign over him and his demonic forces. Therefore, context, and not the metaphor by itself, must determine what degree of restriction is intended. That Stan is “cast out” by Christ’s death does not restrict Satan in every way. Rather, it keeps him from preventing “all people” throughout the earth being drawn to Jesus (John 12:31-32). “Sealing” may connote an absolute incarceration, but it could just as well connote the general idea of “authority over,” which is its primary meaning also in Daniel 6:17 and Matthew 27:66 (though the context of the latter pertains to absolute confinement). God’s “seal” on Christians does not protect them in every sense but only in a spiritual, salvific manner, since they suffer from persecution in various physical ways (see on 7:3; 9:4). Conversely, God’s seal on Satan prevents him from harming the salvific security of the true church, though he can harm it physically.

Now Beale continues, and gives several pages of the nature of the binding and more depth is added to his argument. But I will finish with one last excerpt that I think makes a very strong case, so long as you agree with the recapitulation view of the book of Revelation (which I do).

If our understanding of the disjunctive temporal relation of 20:1-6 to 19:11-21 (that 20:1-6 actually comes chronologically before 19:11-21) and our view of the “keys” are correct, then Christ’s work of restraining the devil’s ability to “deceive” is not a complete curtailment of all the devil’s activities but only a restraint on his deceiving activities. 9:1-10 especially suggests this. The opening of the “abyss” with a key there results in demonic deception and oppression of unbelievers “who do not have the seal of God on their foreheads.” Therefore, the locking up of the “abyss” in 20:1-3 may convey the idea that Satan and his hordes cannot be on the loose to deceive those “who did not receive the mark (of the beast) on their foreheads.” 9:1-10 and 20:1-3 are synchronous and portray those whom Satan is permitted to deceive and those whom he is not permitted to deceive.

I hope this extended series of excerpts serves as a thought provoking adventure into the text. I don’t want to confuse anyone, but rather to offer some more depth to the arguments and viewpoints I’m offering on a Sunday morning.

End Excursus

2:14-15 But I have a few things against you: you have some there who hold the teaching of Balaam, who taught Balak to put a stumbling block before the sons of Israel, so that they might eat food sacrificed to idols and practice sexual immorality. [15] So also you have some who hold the teaching of the Nicolaitans.

Now comes the accusation. The church has followed the way of Balak and in a similar way there’s also a group of them who follow the teaching of the Nicolaitans.

Balaam was a character from the OT and we learn about him and his betrayal of the Israelites in the book of Numbers. He was asked by a foreign King – Balak, king of Moab – to curse the Israelites so that they could be overcome in battle. The Lord intervened and stopped Balaam on in his tracks on his way to meet with the king:

But God’s anger was kindled because he went, and the angel of the LORD took his stand in the way as his adversary. Now he was riding on the donkey, and his two servants were with him. [23] And the donkey saw the angel of the LORD standing in the road, with a drawn sword in his hand. And the donkey turned aside out of the road and went into the field. And Balaam struck the donkey, to turn her into the road. (Numbers 22:22-23)

God had actually given him permission to go only if the men sent from Balak asked him again to come with them. But apparently Balaam couldn’t control his eagerness for the journey and set off on his own accord.[iii]

Balaam ended up being allowed to go to the king, but when he opened his mouth to curse the Israelites at the request of Balak, he could not curse them. Instead he spoke only what God had told him to speak. But later on, Balaam, “encouraged Israel to sin through engaging in idolatry and immorality.”[iv]

As Greg Beale describes, “Balaam’s name became a biblical catch-word for false teachers who for financial gain sought to influence God’s people to engage in ungodly practices (Deuteronomy 23:4; Nehemiah 13:2; 2 Peter 2:15; Jude 11).”[v]

Peter mentions this in his second epistle when describing false teachers:

Forsaking the right way, they have gone astray. They have followed the way of Balaam, the son of Beor, who loved gain from wrongdoing, [16] but was rebuked for his own transgression; a speechless donkey spoke with human voice and restrained the prophet’s madness. (2 Peter 2:15-16)

So there were parts of the church who had been following false teachers motivated out of a desire for wealth and power.

Jesus also mentions that this church has, “some who hold the teaching of the Nicolaitans.” Who are these people? John MacArthur explains well and is worth quoting at length:

The phrase “in the same way” indicates that the teaching of the Nicolaitans led to the same wicked behavior as that of the followers of Balaam…the Nicolaitans derived their name from Nicholas, one of the seven men chosen to oversee the distribution of the food in Acts 6. Where he became an apostate (as some of the early church fathers believed) or the Nicolaitans, his followers, perverted his teachings is not known. Abusing biblical teaching on Christian liberty, the Nicolaitans also taught that Christians could participate in pagan orgies. They seduced the church with immorality and idolatry.

The majority of the believers at Pergamum did not participate in the errors of either heretical group. They remained steadfastly loyal to Christ and the Christian faith. But by tolerating the groups and refusing to exercise church discipline, they shared in their guild, which brought the Lord’s judgment.[vi]

This kind of thing scares me to death because as a church in the modern era, we often refuse to exercise church discipline. The church is seen as a club, but not as an authoritative body of believers. If someone commits a sin and wrongs others in the church, or is in grave error from a teaching standpoint and refuses to repent of that error, that person generally just leaves and goes to another church. We are such a mobile society now that the idea of being tied down to a local body of believers who have authority to admonish individuals, is something that is far from the mindset of many in the modern Christian church.

Commenting on this passage, Matthew Henry says, “Though the church, as such, has no power to punish the persons of men, either for heresy or immorality, with corporal penalties, yet it has power to exclude them from its communion; and, if it do not so, Christ, the head and lawgiver of the church, will be displeased with it.”

One only need look at the fall of Mark Driscoll in Seattle to see how effective a local body can be when functioning correctly. Mark had been off the reservation for a while, and finally the local elder board at his church confronted him about his attitude and his speech and he stepped down. Now this is a nationally known figure. He had a giant ministry that spanned over a network of churches and reached tens of thousands of people. Yet, he was subject to the local body of believers.

Today we need to have local churches that function in this way.

2:16 Therefore repent. If not, I will come to you soon and war against them with the sword of my mouth. [17] He who has an ear, let him hear what the Spirit says to the churches. To the one who conquers I will give some of the hidden manna, and I will give him a white stone, with a new name written on the stone that no one knows except the one who receives it.’

Here is the call to repent followed by the description of the consequences to follow if they do not repent – namely that the Son of God will “war against them with the sword of (his) mouth.”

What does it meant to have God “war against” you? If the sword is the word of God, it is evident they will be judged by the truth that is in that word. As I mentioned before, these churches no longer stand – only the church at Smyrna exists in a city that still stands.

What came to my mind as best showcasing the truth of this is what Jesus says in John 5:

Truly, truly, I say to you, whoever hears my word and believes him who sent me has eternal life. He does not come into judgment, but has passed from death to life. (John 5:24)

Note the close connection between hearing and believing (obeying the word – obeying the gospel) and judgment.

Now secondly note how the when he calls on them to hear what he’s saying – using the familiar phrase, “he who has an ear to hear let him here” – he says that it is the “Spirit” who is speaking. What can He mean by this? Isn’t it Jesus who is speaking?

The answer to this question is that Jesus and the Spirit are of the same mind. Before Jesus left this earth He promised that the Spirit would come to lead (them – the disciples of Jesus) into all truth:

When the Spirit of truth comes, he will guide you into all the truth, for he will not speak on his own authority, but whatever he hears he will speak, and he will declare to you the things that are to come (John 16:13).

The famous Princeton theologian Geerhardus Vos once spoke of the relationship between Jesus and the Spirit in the following way:

…the union effected between him and the Spirit and through the Spirit and believers, acquires the character of an organic mystical union, so that to be in the Spirit is to be in Christ.[vii]

So they are always on the same page. Jesus’ words are the Spirit’s words.

Now the next thing we read is the promise of eternal reward to the one who conquers. Like the other letters, the promise to those Christians who conquer is eternal life with the Father. The neat thing about reading these letters and studying them closely is that we are given the privilege of seeing the different ways in which Jesus describes the splendor of eternity. Here he talks about “hidden manna” and a “white stone.”

Now as you might recall, manna is bread, and in the Bible you’ll see time and again how bread represents sustenance. It represents God’s provision for men. Namely in the OT God provided manna from heaven to the Israelites, and in the NT Jesus called himself the “bread of life.”

Furthermore, interestingly, Jewish tradition talks of how Jeremiah hid some manna in the ark before the temple was destroyed and “that it would be revealed again when the Messiah came” (cf. Exodus 16:32 and 2 Maccabees 2:4-7 – see Beale).

Beale remarks on the meaning here:

Here the idea of the manna may have come to mind because of the preceding meditation on Israel’s confrontation with Balaam in their wilderness journey. Israel should have relied on God’s heavenly food for their sustenance rather than partaking of idolatrous food, and the church will partake of heavenly manna if it does not compromise in the same way.[viii]

Hendricksen hints at Jesus being the hidden manna, and personally that makes the most sense to me. Jesus is the fulfillment of the OT type – He brings satisfaction of a more ultimate kind, and a rest which only comes from Him alone (Hebrews). He is also our ultimate reward.

Now with regard to the white stone, there are a number of theories. I think we don’t have to come down on one thing or another. But George Ladd says:

A white stone (in the ancient world) signified acquittal by a jury, a black stone condemnation. White stones were used as tickets of admission to public festivals. This meaning fits the context best. The white stone is a symbol of admission to the messianic feast.

Whereas Hendricksen says that there are only two possibilities in his research.

The first is that the stone represents the person himself – “just as in Israel the twelve tribes were represented by twelve precious stones in the breastplate of the high priest (Exodus 28:15-21). Now this stone is white. This indicates holiness, beauty, glory…the stone itself symbolized durability, imperishability. The white stone, therefore, indicates a being, free form guilt and cleansed of all sin, and abiding in this state for ever and ever.

The second interpretation the pellucid, precious stone – a diamond? – is inscribed with the name of Christ. Receiving this stone with its new name means that in glory the conqueror receives a revelation of the sweetness of fellowship with Christ – in His new character, as newly crowned Mediator – a fellowship which only those who receive it can appreciate.

Interestingly Hendricksen gives pages of arguments in favor of each possibility. I’m not sure that it’s all that important to nail down an opinion about what the white stone means. But I think that it generally symbolizes the uniqueness of the individual relationship with God, and reward that each person has for following Christ. We are all one body, but it’s a body made up of individuals. And here Jesus is saying that He knows us all by name, He has called specific people to life according to His eternal hidden purposes. And the gifts of God are indeed irrevocable, and eternal.

Conclusion: Doctrine Matters

So what can we say about this church? What are we to learn from its mistakes and its commendation?

Many are quick to call this the “worldly church” because of its compromise with the world. Perhaps a better moniker would be the “compromising church” or “the timid church.”

What is so scary about this church is that, while they loved the Lord, they didn’t love him enough to guard their church from compromise. They didn’t love him – or each other – enough to reject false teaching, or admonish and discipline those who were led astray by false teaching.

Doctrine matters. If we are not firmly rooted in the truth of God’s Word we will be easily misled. The entire church in Pergamum was admonished for the actions of a few people. And if we are not firm in our convictions, we’ll tolerate the infiltration of false doctrine in our churches. I’m not just speaking about the church as a whole (The universal church), but more particularly our church – our local body of believers. Because it’s a heck of a lot easier to recognize and reject unorthodox teaching from Mark Driscoll, or Rob Bell, than it is to gently approach the Sunday school teacher here in our church for wrongly interpreting the word of God.

Yet we are called to do just that. But how are we to do that if we are not first grounded in what is right and true? This is a call for both understanding, and for courage and purity in the local body.

 

[i] Hendricksen, Pg. 66.

[ii] MacArthur, Pg. 84-85. He has a good bit of insight on the background of the city here, and quotes William Ramsay’s book ‘The Letters to the Seven Churches of Asia’, which is an old book itself! Ramsay was one of the most renowned archeologists of the last 150 years.

[iii] Matthew Henry Notes: “God gave him leave to go if the men called him, but he was so fond of the journey that we do not find he staid for their calling him, but he himself rose up in the morning, got everything ready with all speed, and went with the princes of Moab, who were proud enough that they had carried their point. The apostle describes Balaam’s sin here to be that he ran greedily into an error for reward, Jude 1:11.”

[iv] Beale, shorter commentary on Revelation, Pg. 66.

[v] Beale, shorter commentary on Revelation, Pg. 66.

[vi] MacArthur, Volume I, Commentary on Revelation, Pg. 89.

[vii] Danny Olinger, ‘A Geerhardus Vos Anthology’, Pg. 323.

[viii] Beale, the longer commentary, Pg. 252.

Study Notes: Revelation 2:8-11 The Church at Smyrna

To the Church in Smyrna

The church in Smyrna was likely founded during Paul’s third missionary journey. Smyrna was one of the most beautiful cities in Asia. A rival to Ephesus, they considered themselves the ‘first city of Asia’ and were happily situated on the Aegean Sea.[i]

Hendricksen describes the scene:

A gloriously picturesque city, is sloped up from the sea, and its splendid public building on the rounded top of the hill Pagos formed what was known as ‘the crown of Smyrna’. The westerly breeze, the zephyr, comes from the sea and blows through every part of the city rendering it fresh and cool even during the summer.[ii]

Apparently the people of Smyrna had always been loyal to Rome – so much so that their faithfulness became proverbial throughout the Roman Empire. And it is the only of the seven cities of ancient Asia written to here in Revelation that still remain today (not called Izmir).[iii]

There was a substantial colony of Jews who must have been living in Smyrna at this time, and we know from history that they were very hostile – along with other Gentiles – to the Christian message.

This was the city where it is believe Polycarp was bishop. Polycarp was a disciple of John, and a famous Martyr. John Foxe wrote of him as follows:

After a respite, the Christians again came under persecution, this time from Marcus Aurelius, in AD 161.

One of those who suffered this time was Polycarp, the venerable bishop of Smyrna…

Hearing his captors had arrived one evening, Polycarp left his bed to welcome them, ordered a meal prepared for them, and then asked for an hour alone to pray. The soldiers were so impressed by Polycarp’s advanced age and composure that they began to wonder why they had been sent to take him; but as soon as he had finished his prayer, they put him on a donkey and brought him to the city.

As he entered the stadium with is guards, a voice from heaven was heard to say, “Be strong, Polycarp, and play the man.” No one nearby saw anyone speaking, but many people heard the voice.

Brought before the tribunal and the crowd, Polycarp refused to deny Christ, although the proconsul begged him: “Consider yourself and have pity on your great age. Reproach Christ and I will release you.”

Polycarp replied, “Eighty-six years I have served Him, and He never once wronged me. How can I blaspheme my King who saved me?”

Threatened with wild beasts and fire, Polycarp stood his ground. “What are you waiting for? Do whatever you please.” The crowd demanded Polycarp’s death, gathering wood for the fire and preparing to tie him to the stake.

“Leave me,” he said. “He who will give me strength to sustain the fire will help me not flinch from the pile.” So they bound him but didn’t nail him to the stake. As soon as Polycarp finished him prayer the fire was lit, but it leaped up around him, leaving him unburned, until the people convinced a soldier to plunge a sword into him. When he did, so much blood gushed out that the fire was immediately extinguished. The soldiers then placed his body into a fire and burned it to ashes, which some Christians later gathered up and buried properly.[iv]

Hendriksen, Macarthur (in an extended treatment), and Ladd all mention this story as well because it offers us context for understanding the kind of persecution that the early church faced. This is why John’s letter was so important to them.

2:8 “And to the angel of the church in Smyrna write: ‘The words of the first and the last, who died and came to life.

We’ve spoken in the past few lessons about the significance of the Resurrection of Jesus Christ.

Jesus has already used this description for himself a few times now in the book. We just read in 1:18 that, “and the living one. I died, and behold I am alive forevermore, and I have the keys of Death and Hades”

Why is it that Jesus seems so intent on using the resurrection as a descriptor for himself?

I believe that the reason ties in to the one of the book’s major themes, namely to comfort Christians. If Jesus didn’t rise from the dead, then much of what we believe would really not be founded on much at all.

Paul put it this way:

But if there is no resurrection of the dead, then not even Christ has been raised. [14] And if Christ has not been raised, then our preaching is in vain and your faith is in vain. [15] We are even found to be misrepresenting God, because we testified about God that he raised Christ, whom he did not raise if it is true that the dead are not raised. [16] For if the dead are not raised, not even Christ has been raised. [17] And if Christ has not been raised, your faith is futile and you are still in your sins. [18] Then those also who have fallen asleep in Christ have perished. [19] If in Christ we have hope in this life only, we are of all people most to be pitied. (1 Corinthians 15:13-19)

So Jesus is going out of His way to ensure His followers that they aren’t just blindly following a dead man. They aren’t suffering for someone’s memory, and they aren’t going through terrible persecution for no reason with no hope and no end in sight.

Furthermore, He once again ties the resurrection in with His deity. He essentially proclaims that He is God by stating that He is eternal. That is what He means when He says, “The words of the first and the last.”

Now, what is amazing to me is that there is yet another close bond between His eternality and His resurrection. Do you know what that is? It’s found in the book of Acts in one of Peter’s sermons:

“Men of Israel, hear these words: Jesus of Nazareth, a man attested to you by God with mighty works and wonders and signs that God did through him in your midst, as you yourselves know—[23] this Jesus, delivered up according to the definite plan and foreknowledge of God, you crucified and killed by the hands of lawless men. [24] God raised him up, loosing the pangs of death, because it was not possible for him to be held by it. (Acts 2:22-24)

Death cannot hold down what is eternal!

I like what my good friend Tony Romano said one time (paraphrasing John Piper I believe):

When you kill a man, and He gets up three days later and walk out triumphant and then ascends up into heaven…that guy can’t be stopped! Therefore, He’s the guarantee (of our salvation).

No wonder Jesus wanted to address the church this way! This would have been a powerful reminder of His triumph over the grave.

2:9 “‘I know your tribulation and your poverty (but you are rich) and the slander of those who say that they are Jews and are not, but are a synagogue of Satan.

Let’s look together at two things here. First, the nature of true riches, and second, what it means to be a real “Jew.”

True Riches

I love the parenthetical statement by Jesus here. First, He acknowledges their poverty and their troubles. But He is quick to say that even though they are materially poor, they are truly rich! Why? Because they have treasure which cannot be taken away from them! They have been given abundant riches in Christ.

What a contrast here between the way charlatans like Joel Olsteen teach and how our Lord teaches!

And this is not an isolated sentence. The Scriptures speak continually of what true treasure really looks like. I can broadly categorize these verses into two categories: Those that warn of money’s inability to provide salvation or peace, and those which encourage a more substantial treasure which is found in the things of God.

A few warnings…

They will fling their silver into the streets and their gold will become an abhorrent thing; their silver and their gold will not be able to deliver them in the day of the wrath of the LORD. They cannot satisfy their appetite nor can they fill their stomachs, for their iniquity has become an occasion of stumbling. (Ezekiel 7:19)

Riches do not profit in the day of wrath, But righteousness delivers from death. (Proverbs 11:4)

Neither their silver nor their gold Will be able to deliver them On the day of the LORD’S wrath; And all the earth will be devoured In the fire of His jealousy, For He will make a complete end, Indeed a terrifying one, Of all the inhabitants of the earth. (Zephaniah 1:18)

A better way…

Do not store up for yourselves treasures on earth, where moth and rust destroy, and where thieves break in and steal. (Matthew 6:19)

And he told them a parable, saying, “The land of a rich man produced plentifully, [17] and he thought to himself, ‘What shall I do, for I have nowhere to store my crops?’ [18] And he said, ‘I will do this: I will tear down my barns and build larger ones, and there I will store all my grain and my goods. [19] And I will say to my soul, “Soul, you have ample goods laid up for many years; relax, eat, drink, be merry.”’ [20] But God said to him, ‘Fool! This night your soul is required of you, and the things you have prepared, whose will they be?’ [21] So is the one who lays up treasure for himself and is not rich toward God.” (Luke 12:16-21)

There are many more (as you might imagine!). And when we get to chapter three, the topic will come up again!

Why do you think it is that Jesus feels its important to address this? Why remind them of the fact that they are truly rich? Why not just tell them that if they’ll obey, they’ll find wealth here on earth. After all, that’s what we’re told today by many a pastor.

I believe it is because Jesus is really interested in giving us a life eternal, but also in helping us face this life with clear eyes and hearts that won’t melt at the first sign of trouble. In other words, He’s a realist – in fact He is the ultimate interpreter of reality.

But there is something more…abundant life does start now in this life whether you’re poor financially or rich. Some of the richest people in this world are those who are most miserable. This have always been the case. I’m not saying that being poor is wonderful, so don’t get me wrong on that account, because its not! But rather, sometimes money can cloud our thinking and interrupt us from focusing on what will make us most happy in life – peace with God and others. A full heart. A happy heart. A mind not full of hate and violence. A life not marked by sin. And much more. These are the root matters – the heart of the situation, you might say. And it is this root, this foundational level of life, which Jesus is seeking to renew.

“He Who is a Jew…”

Here is where it may be easy to get tripped up if we are reading in an overly literal way, and why we need to learn to read our Bibles in light of how the New Testament authors have written, not allowing our own presuppositions to cloud our thinking.[v]

John seems to be saying there are some false Jews – people who claim to be Jews but are really “of the Synagogue of Satan.” Is John referring to ethnic Jews, or is he using “Jews” as a way to describe the people of God? I think “both” is the answer.

First of all, let us think through some things here logically. It is not like being a Jew was just a choice. It is an ethnic distinction. So no one is going to be fooled by someone pretending to be a Jew outwardly. You either are or you aren’t. So the question is: why would John be writing to the Christian church in order to warn them of false Jews, as if being a good Jew was somehow now the paragon of what God wanted in the new covenant community? Furthermore, why would Christians be on the lookout for those who are true Jews (in the ethnic sense), when it was those (supposed) law-abiding Jews who were most hostile to Christians during this time?

George Ladd helps provide the answer:

These “Jews” are without question Jews by race and religion, who met together in the synagogue to worship the Lord. But in reality, inwardly, they are not Jews because they have rejected Jesus as their Messiah and confirmed their rejection by persecuting his church. Who, then, are the true Jews? John does not offer an explicit answer, but the implication is clear: true Jews are the people of the Messiah.

Therefore, though Jesus is making a distinction between those who appear outwardly as religious, but inwardly not God’s people.

Think of how Paul uses the term “Jew” in Romans (both MacArthur and Ladd go on to quote Romans 2):

For no one is a Jew who is merely one outwardly, nor is circumcision outward and physical. [29] But a Jew is one inwardly, and circumcision is a matter of the heart, by the Spirit, not by the letter. His praise is not from man but from God. (Romans 2:28-29)

And…

But it is not as though the word of God has failed. For not all who are descended from Israel belong to Israel, [7] and not all are children of Abraham because they are his offspring, but “Through Isaac shall your offspring be named.” [8] This means that it is not the children of the flesh who are the children of God, but the children of the promise are counted as offspring. (Romans 9:6-8)

And as Beale concludes, “That the Jewish community is identified as false Jews and a synagogue of Satan confirms again that the church is seen by Christ as the true people of God, true Israel. This identification is confirmed not only by broad contextual indicators (e.g 1:6, 9, 12; 217; 3:9, 12; 5:9-10; 7:4-9. 15-17; 11:1-4), but also by recognizing that in the immediate context the church is seen as fulfilling Isaiah’s prophecy about Israel.”[vi]

The second major point here is that those who are not “Jews” are of the church or “synagogue” of Satan. What this means is that there is a strict dichotomy in this life. You are either a Christian or you’re in the enemy camp. Even if you think you’re a non-combatant, you’re simply a pawn of the Enemy.

As Jesus says, “Whoever is not with me is against me, and whoever does not gather with me scatters” (Matthew 12:30).

There is no middle ground spiritually. There are only those who are saved, and those who are not. There will be no Purgatory in the afterlife; there will be no middle ground for eternity. There is no salvation for those who abstain from belief in God.

2:10 Do not fear what you are about to suffer. Behold, the devil is about to throw some of you into prison, that you may be tested, and for ten days you will have tribulation. Be faithful unto death, and I will give you the crown of life.

Be Faithful

It has sort of become a joke that the first time Rod Kinsey and I got into a discussion about faith and our beliefs, he told me that there is really only one main thing that dominates his thinking about the Christian life. That one thing is summed up in two words: Be faithful.

What does it mean to “be faithful”?

I’d say that if we’re to take this passage as our study guide it means to follow Christ no matter the circumstances or consequences – even unto death.

Now who would do such a thing for a man that never rose from the dead (I told you the resurrection was important!)?

The resurrection itself has been so well defended, that no credible historical, psychological, philosophical, or archeological argument remains viable. I believe that all the past debate on this matter was because everyone from Christian scholars to atheist historians have understood the stakes. But for the purposes of what we’re talking about here, we need to understand that in order to have faith that is strong enough to last even “unto death”, I believe two things must be in place:

  1. There must be a logical (mental) fact-based reason for believing that having Christian faith is reasonable. Remember, we don’t just hold these beliefs blindly. God has given us His word, and the entire created order from which to know Him.
  2. There must be a radical change of the heart – a supernatural change that must come from outside ourselves. It is not just enough to know something is true. Just knowing something is true is not enough for millions of Christians to have died for that “reason.” There must also be such a powerful transformation of the heart that one is willing to do whatever before ever renouncing the name of the Lord Jesus.

Side Note: Now, you might say that, “millions have died for Islam” – this is true. However, they are still missing these two components. They might think they have the first, but for many, their reasoning is based not on facts, but on lies told them by their Imam. They certainly don’t have the second. Perhaps they mistake the second as passion for their cause – but this isn’t the same thing as having a heart transformed by the Spirit of God. The proof is measured in their works. For one thing, the result of a Christian’s heart change is peace and love, whereas the passion of a Muslim is most often devotion through killing and murder of innocents. This is a larger conversation, but its one worth having in the appropriate context.

Therefore, Jesus calls His followers to faith because He knows He’s given them a legitimate reason, and an transforming ability and strength to remain faithful. For as Paul rightly states:

No temptation has overtaken you that is not common to man. God is faithful, and he will not let you be tempted beyond your ability, but with the temptation he will also provide the way of escape, that you may be able to endure it. (1 Corinthians 10:13)

2:11 He who has an ear, let him hear what the Spirit says to the churches. The one who conquers will not be hurt by the second death.’

Once again Jesus uses the terminology about hearing with the help of the Spirit – “having an ear” is something we’ve spoken about before, and it indicates that this letter is written to those whose hearts belong to Jesus.

But this is the first time we’ve encountered the phrase the “second death” – spiritual death. The second death is not physical, but spiritual. It is spiritual separation from the Father and an eternity in Hell.

Jesus is conveying in clear terms that though you may die for my name here on earth in Asia (or anywhere else for that matter), you will not experience spiritual separation from God upon physical death.

John MacArthur notes that the word “not” here is “the strongest negative the Greek language can express.”[vii] It is an emphatic statement of comfort. The one who conquered death and holds its’ keys (1:18) will not allow His true church to perish for eternity no matter what happens here on earth.

Therefore stand fast in the Lord. For as Paul says:

The sting of death is sin, and the power of sin is the law. [57] But thanks be to God, who gives us the victory through our Lord Jesus Christ. [58] Therefore, my beloved brothers, be steadfast, immovable, always abounding in the work of the Lord, knowing that in the Lord your labor is not in vain. (1 Corinthians 15:56-58)

Footnotes

[i] Hendriksen, Pg. 63.

[ii] Hendriksen, Pg. 64.

[iii] Mounce, Pg. 91.

[iv] John Foxe, ‘Foxe’s Christian Martyrs’, (abridged and modern language edition) Pg. 22.

[v] Significantly, even John MacArthur acknowledges that John isn’t referring to ethnic Jews but to those who are Jews in the Pauline sense (Romans 2:28-29 is cited in his commentary): the church. This is an example of where MacArthur gets it right, but where his hermeneutic also falls apart. If we are to read everything literally where possible it makes it difficult to come to this conclusion. I believe MacArthur comes to this conclusion because he is a man so steeped in Biblical knowledge that when he reads the passage, verse after verse from Paul spring to mind and he cannot deny the weight of the NT usage of the term – especially in light of the obvious issues with this referring to ethnic Jews (detailed above). The issue is that he should have first asked “how does the NT talk about Jews, and what is the context of the exhortation/immediate surrounding context, along with the wider context of the book itself (which is highly symbolic)? MacArthur is not saved by his hermeneutic in my opinion, but by his years of faithful exposition and Bible study. I greatly respect his wisdom, but I believe his hermeneutic starts him in the wrong place and makes it much more difficult for those laymen who are not as steeped in the Bible and don’t have that knowledge to correct ill-conceived presuppositions.

[vi] Beale, the shorter commentary on Revelation, Pg. 62.

[vii] MacArthur, Pg. 79.

Study Notes: Revelation 2:1-7 the letter to Ephesus

Chapter Two 

Introduction – Letters to the Churches 

Those who hold the historist view of Revelation believe that each of the letters to the churches we’ll read in chapters 2 and 3 represent a time period in history. They try and align the descriptions of the churches here to the circumstances of the church at different times up until the present time. Of course we’ve discussed how this view leaves something to be desired because 1. Some scholars have made points that show it doesn’t really match up that well technically, 2. You can always use circumstances in each letter to describe the church in any time, 3. Those who espouse this view have a very westernized perspective on the church, all but ignoring the other areas in which the gospel is being proclaimed throughout the world, 4. As history has unfolded, the historists have had to continually update their schema. That alone shows just how fluid this model is.

All that being said, there are benefits for us today in these chapters (2 and 3). The proper way to examine them is to ask first of all, “what would they have meant in their original context, to their original audience?” and secondly, “what can we learn from them today?”

I like what Warren Wiersbe says, “John did not send this book of prophecy to the assemblies in order to satisfy their curiosity about the future. God’s people were going through intense persecution, and they needed encouragement….Some students see in these seven churches a ‘panorama of church history,’ from apostolic times (Ephesus) to the apostate days of the twentieth century (Laodicea). While these churches may illustrate various stages in the history of the church, that was probably not the main reason why these particular assemblies were selected. Instead, these letters remind us that the exalted Head of the church knows what is going on in each assembly, and that our relationship to Him and His Word determines the life and ministry of the local body.”

The churches in chapters 2-3 are all admonished and commended. Smyrna and Philadelphia are the only churches commended without rebuke. They are given more instruction and encouraged to “keep the faith.” (*By the way, has there ever been an entire AGE of the church that is free from sin that didn’t need rebuke? – I think not!) Churches received admonishments for indifference, love for Christ no longer being fervent, being a dead church, tolerating cults of idolatry and immorality, and tolerating heresies.

Specific instructions ranged from doing the works which they (the church) did “at the first”, to keeping the faith and strengthening what remained. At least four of the churches were called on to repent (Ephesus, Pergamum, Sardis, Laodicea, and a specific group in Thyatira was called to repent as well).

Jim Hamilton sees an interesting chiastic structure in the letters (which he describes in terms of a framed picture). This may provide a helpful as a visual to breakdown the section:

  1. Revelation 2:1-7, to the church in Ephesus, which has lost its first love. Think of the letter to Ephesus as the wooden border of (a picture) frame on one side.
    1. Revelation 2:8-11, to the church in Smyrna, which is commended for its faithfulness, not reproved, and not called to repentance. Think of the letter to Smyrna as the mat on one side of the frame.
      1. Revelation 2:12-17, to the church in Pergamum, which has people who hold to a false teaching, eat food sacrificed to idols, and practice sexual immorality. Think of the letter to Pergamum as one side of the picture that is matted and framed.
      2. Revelation 2:18-29, to the church in Thyatira, which seems worse off than the church in Pergamum because it tolerated a false prophetess who seduces people to practice sexual immorality, eat food sacrificed to idols, and is unrepentant! Think of the letter to Thyatira as the middle of the picture that is matted and framed.
      3. Revelation 3:1-6, to the church in Sardis, which is worse than both Pergamum and Thyatira because it is dead. Think of the letter to Sardis as the other wise of the framed and matted picture.

A.   Revelation 3:7-13, to the church in Philadelphia, which like the church in Smyrna is commended for its faithfulness, not reproved, and not called to repentance. Think of the letter to Philadelphia as the other side of the mat.

  1. Revelation 3:14-22, to the church in Laodicea, which like Ephesus has lost its first love and is now lukewarm. Think of the letter to Laodicea as the other wooden border on the far side of the frame.

Lastly, the promises to each church are rich with meaning. John MacArthur lists some of them in the following way: the tree of life, the crown of life, the hidden manna and a stone with a new name, rule over nations and receiving the morning star, faithful being honored and clothed in white, given a place in God’s presence, a new name, and the New Jerusalem, and having a share in Christ’s throne.[1] 

To the Church in Ephesus

2:1 “To the angel of the church in Ephesus write: ‘The words of him who holds the seven stars in his right hand, who walks among the seven golden lampstands.

The History of the Church at Ephesus 

The Ephesian church had a rich Christian history even by the time of John’s writing. It was the scene of many of Paul’s works and preaching, and it was the center of John’s ministry as well.

George Ladd remarks, “Ephesus was for a long time the commercial centre of Asia. The temple of Diana was at the same time a treasure house, a museum, and a place of refuge for criminals. It furnished employment for many, including the silversmiths who made miniature shrines of Diana.”[2]

Pricilla and Aquila were the first to share the gospel along with Paul in this thriving metropolis:

After this, Paul stayed many days longer and then took leave of the brothers and set sail for Syria, and with him Priscilla and Aquila. At Cenchreae he had cut his hair, for he was under a vow. [19] And they came to Ephesus, and he left them there, but he himself went into the synagogue and reasoned with the Jews. [20] When they asked him to stay for a longer period, he declined. [21] But on taking leave of them he said, “I will return to you if God wills,” and he set sail from Ephesus. (Acts 18:18-21)

John MacArthur gives us more context on this important city:

They (Pricilla and Aquila) were soon joined by the eloquent preacher and powerful debated Apollos (Acts 18:24-26). Pricilla, Aquila, and Apollos laid the groundwork for Paul’s ministry in Ephesus.

The apostle Paul stopped briefly in Ephesus near the end of his second missionary journey (Acts 18:19-21), but his real ministry in that key city took place on his third missionary journey. Arriving in Ephesus, he first encountered a group of Old Testament saints, followers of John the Baptist (Acts 19:1-7). After preaching the gospel to them, he baptized them in the name of the Lord Jesus Christ (Acts 19:5). That began Paul’s work of building the church at Ephesus – a work that would last for three years (Acts 20:31).[3]

Paul’s ministry in Ephesus was so impactful that many people repented of their magic, and their sorcery and idolatry. So this church began in a miraculous way, with hundreds – if not thousands of people coming to faith in Jesus.

Sovereign Over the Church

It says here that the one authoring the letter both walks among the lampstands, and holds the seven stars in his hands. We’ve already seen that this “one” is Jesus Christ. And if we are correct in our interpretation that the stars and the lampstands both represent the church (its heavenly and earthly components), then Jesus is seen here as both omnipresent amongst His people, and sovereign over their lives.

He not only walks with us and amongst us, seeing all we do, but He also holds all circumstances – and our very lives – in His hands.

This is seen all the more clearly as we read on…

2:2 “‘I know your works, your toil and your patient endurance, and how you cannot bear with those who are evil, but have tested those who call themselves apostles and are not, and found them to be false.

I Know

He begins by saying “I know” your works. Throughout these letters He says these two words “I know”, and it shows us that even though He is in heaven, He is not far – nor is He missing anything going on here on earth.

During His ministry, Jesus said that God knows the number of even the hairs on our heads (Luke 12:7). The underlying assumption here is that Jesus is divine. He is God. He knows all the goings on in our lives. But not only does He know them – He controls them.

You Have Tested

Then He says something interesting. Jesus says that the church at Ephesus has “tested those who call themselves apostles and are not, and found them to be false.”

In John’s first epistle he had instructed the church to “test the spirits”:

Beloved, do not believe every spirit, but test the spirits to see whether they are from God, for many false prophets have gone out into the world. [2] By this you know the Spirit of God: every spirit that confesses that Jesus Christ has come in the flesh is from God, [3] and every spirit that does not confess Jesus is not from God. This is the spirit of the antichrist, which you heard was coming and now is in the world already. (1 John 4:1-3)

So the church had been vigilant in testing doctrine, and rejecting false leaders and false doctrine.

This is a rather challenging passage I think, because it is rather common today for Christians not to know enough about their Bible to be able to test anyone at all. In order to test a leader and what a leader teaches, one must be a skilled handler of the word.

Of course one of the most famous examples of this “testing” took place during the ministry of Paul:

Paul and Silas in Berea [10] The brothers immediately sent Paul and Silas away by night to Berea, and when they arrived they went into the Jewish synagogue. [11] Now these Jews were more noble than those in Thessalonica; they received the word with all eagerness, examining the Scriptures daily to see if these things were so. (Acts 17:10-11)

In order to spot a false teaching one must know the real article. That’s why experts in counterfeit money spend a great deal of time first becoming intimately familiar with real money. Likewise, we too ought to be intimately familiar with the Word of God.

2:3 I know you are enduring patiently and bearing up for my name’s sake, and you have not grown weary.

Next Jesus gives His second commendation, namely that the people of Ephesus have stood firm in their doctrine for the sake of the name of Jesus. They have not grown weary.

Similarly, we are called by God not to grow weary of doing good:

And let us not grow weary of doing good, for in due season we will reap, if we do not give up. [10] So then, as we have opportunity, let us do good to everyone, and especially to those who are of the household of faith. (Galatians 6:9-10)

Additionally, we are to do all things for the glory of God and the praise of Jesus’ name without grumbling, but steadfast and enduring:

Do all things without grumbling or disputing, [15] that you may be blameless and innocent, children of God without blemish in the midst of a crooked and twisted generation, among whom you shine as lights in the world, [16] holding fast to the word of life, so that in the day of Christ I may be proud that I did not run in vain or labor in vain. (Philippians 2:14-16)

The people of Ephesus had been “enduring” patiently, and this brings to mind that passage in Romans which brings such hope to those enduring trials:

Through him we have also obtained access by faith into this grace in which we stand, and we rejoice in hope of the glory of God. [3] Not only that, but we rejoice in our sufferings, knowing that suffering produces endurance, [4] and endurance produces character, and character produces hope, [5] and hope does not put us to shame, because God’s love has been poured into our hearts through the Holy Spirit who has been given to us. (Romans 5:2-5)

Unfortunately, the Lord didn’t stop with these two commendations…

2:4-5 But I have this against you, that you have abandoned the love you had at first. [5] Remember therefore from where you have fallen; repent, and do the works you did at first. If not, I will come to you and remove your lampstand from its place, unless you repent.

The call from the Lord is to repent for loss of their “first love”. I once heard a great sermon on this passage from Pastor Philip De Courcy who admonished us (in Toledo at the time) that we too had lost our first love. The “first”, he said, is not a matter of chronology, but a matter of priority.

This church reflected a church who had likely been in existence over 40 years. A new generation was rising up that was not as zealous as the first generation. They had been trained well in doctrine, but their hearts were not passionate for the Lord.

Does this reflect us today? Is the Lord the main priority, the main focus, the main driving ambition of your life? If you cannot answer, “yes” to these questions then this rebuke is aimed squarely at you.

It is not simply enough to be thoughtfully cognizant of these truths, we must govern our lives by them, and from them all of our greatest passions must emanate.

Many of you are more passionate about your work, your family, or your football than you are the Lord Jesus Christ. What thrills your hearts and minds? What kindles excitement on Friday afternoon when the workday is coming to a close?

Now I am not saying that it is bad to be interested in doctrine – no one who knows me even a little would ever accuse me of that! But what I am saying is that the reign of God in your heart is more than a truth marked down on the page of a Bible from when you accepted the Lord. Church, your Bible, your Christian friends and conversation ought to thrill your soul!

If not, then there is no doubt that you must repent. Repentance is not simply mental, it is from the heart. It is a mindful and soulful recognition that you have been cold in heart and must soften and ask for forgiveness.

I will go a step further – if these words do not ring true to you, and you find them to be insulting or find yourself even indifferent to their message, then I would strongly urge that you check to see if you are in the faith at all. For as Paul says:

Examine yourselves, to see whether you are in the faith. Test yourselves. Or do you not realize this about yourselves, that Jesus Christ is in you?—unless indeed you fail to meet the test! (2 Corinthians 13:5)

Christians, it is of my own experience week to week that I can tell you that becoming cold in heart is possible even for the most devoted followers of Jesus. If we spend a great deal of time not fired by the fellowship of believers, and the encouragement and refining of the Word of God, then we are likely to get cold of heart and undisciplined of mind. We were never meant to walk this life alone (Hebrews 10). Therefore strengthen yourselves in the strength God has given you.

Finally, be strong in the Lord and in the strength of his might. [11] Put on the whole armor of God, that you may be able to stand against the schemes of the devil. [12] For we do not wrestle against flesh and blood, but against the rulers, against the authorities, against the cosmic powers over this present darkness, against the spiritual forces of evil in the heavenly places. [13] Therefore take up the whole armor of God, that you may be able to withstand in the evil day, and having done all, to stand firm. (Ephesians 6:10-13)

2:6 Yet this you have: you hate the works of the Nicolaitans, which I also hate.

Interestingly, not only are we called to love that which God loves, but to hate that which He hates. It is a common misconception that “hate” is wrong in any situation. Not true. We are called to hate sin, and to war against it. We ought to have sensitive consciences that recoil at the evil of the world, yet courageous hearts that do not shrink back from society. We are not called to be societal introverts, but to live our lives in and amongst unbelievers, loving and caring for them as light in the darkness of their lives.

That being said, we can only “hate” and “love” correctly by instruction and guidance and knowing what it is that God loves and hates. We do this by spending time in the word, and soaking in the reality of His character and actions.

2:7 He who has an ear, let him hear what the Spirit says to the churches. To the one who conquers I will grant to eat of the tree of life, which is in the paradise of God.’

There are three parts to this final verse…

First, the final admonition resounds with familiar words from the life of Jesus. Jesus would often call on those who were spiritual to understand His words. He would do this by saying phrases like “he who has an ear, let him hear.”

Note now that Christ is speaking to believers. For He says that this message is coming from “the Spirit.”

Paul explains:

The natural person does not accept the things of the Spirit of God, for they are folly to him, and he is not able to understand them because they are spiritually discerned. [15] The spiritual person judges all things, but is himself to be judged by no one. [16] “For who has understood the mind of the Lord so as to instruct him?” But we have the mind of Christ. (1 Corinthians 2:14-16)

During our study of the Gospel of John, we talked a lot about the nature of the spiritual man versus the unspiritual man and the way in which God works within a man to open those closed “ears” of his heart and mind.

Jesus’ quote is actually rooted in Isaiah’s call (Isaiah 6:9-10), and is the explaination for why men reject Christ – their hearts are hardened by their love of sin (see also John 12:36-43).

Secondly, we see what will become an evermore familiar refrain “To the one who conquers” followed by a promise of eternal life (which we’ll address momentarily).

William Hendriksen, whose commentary on Revelation is titled ‘More Than Conquerors’, has this to say:

The conqueror is the man who fights against sin, the devil, and his whole dominion and in his love for Christ perseveres to the very end. To such a conqueror is promised something better than food offered to idols, with which the heathen at their licentious festivals probably tried to tempt church members. The conqueror would be given to eat of the tree of life (Gen. 3:22; Rev. 22:2, 14); that is, he would inherit eternal life in the paradise of heaven.[4]

As Ladd explains, all those who are believers are conquerors, and all who are conquerors are those who are take up their cross daily (Matthew 21:27), and follow Christ – even though it may cost us our lives:

The Revelation pictures a life and death struggle between Christ and the Antichrist for the heats of men; and the conqueror is he who is unswervingly loyal to his Lord even though it costs him his life.[5]

Third, Beale makes the point that the “main point of every letter” to the churches is that he who conquers will gain eternal life. It reminds me of the essence for which Christ came to Earth in the first place:

The thief comes only to steal and kill and destroy. I came that they may have life and have it abundantly. (John 10:10)

The essence of the letter is one of encouragement, admonition, and a reminder of the larger work of redemption that Christ is doing in them and in the whole world from the time of the fall until He returns in glory.

The “Tree of Life” of course is first found in Genesis:

And out of the ground the LORD God made to spring up every tree that is pleasant to the sight and good for food. The tree of life was in the midst of the garden, and the tree of the knowledge of good and evil. (Genesis 2:9)

And later found in Paradise at the end of Revelation:

Then the angel showed me the river of the water of life, bright as crystal, flowing from the throne of God and of the Lamb [2] through the middle of the street of the city; also, on either side of the river, the tree of life with its twelve kinds of fruit, yielding its fruit each month. The leaves of the tree were for the healing of the nations. (Revelation 22:1-2)

Blessed are those who wash their robes, so that they may have the right to the tree of life and that they may enter the city by the gates. (Revelation 22:14)

…and if anyone takes away from the words of the book of this prophecy, God will take away his share in the tree of life and in the holy city, which are described in this book. (Revelation 22:19)

Morris adds helpful context when he says, “Paradise was originally a Persian word for pleasure garden. In later Judaism it was used to portray the abode of the righteous dead. The Paradise of God in Revelation symbolizes the eschatological state in which God and man are restored to that perfect fellowship which existed before the entrance of sin into the world.”[6]

Beale adds a helpful explanation as to how the tree ties into the redemptive work of Jesus:

To “eat of the tree of life, which is in the paradise of God” is a picture of forgiveness and consequent experience of God’s intimate presence (22:2-4). The same end-time hope is referred to with virtually identical language in several early Jewish texts…And in Genesis 2-3 the image of the “tree of life” together with the “paradise of God” symbolizes the life-giving presence of God, from which Adam and Eve were separated when they were cast out of the garden paradise…Revelation speaks of the consummated restoration of this divine presence among humanity in the future (22:2-4), which has already been inaugurated in the present. Therefore, the “tree” refers to the redemptive effects of the cross, which bring about the restoration of God’s presence, and does not refer to the cross (itself).[7]

I pray that we all would ensure that our top priority, our top passion, and main concern in this life is the cause of Christ. I pray that His lordship would be evident in my own life, and that whether I eat drink or sleep that I would do all for the glory of God (1 Corinthians 10:31).

FOOTNOTES

[1] MacArthur’s Bible Handbook, Pg. 519.

[2] Hendriksen, Pg. 60.

[3] John MacArthur, Commentary on Revelation Volume I, Pg. 56.

[4] Hendriksen, Pg. 63.

[5] Ladd, Pg. 41.

[6] Morris, Pg. 90.

[7] Beale, the longer commentary, Pg. 234-235.

Study Notes: Revelation 1:17-20

Tomorrow I will be teaching the beginning of chapter two of Revelation, but as I went to examine my previous notes, I realized that I never posted them up online! So, here they are, I hope that they are helpful for those studying along with us.

1:17a When I saw him, I fell at his feet as though dead. 

Perhaps this sounds odd to you. Why would a man, a righteous man like John with his mental faculties completely intact, find cause to fall at the feet of this person?

If you are a student of the Bible, you might recall that for a man to fall on their face, or have a significant reaction at the appearance of God is actually quite a normal occurrence in sacred Scripture. Why is this? Well, I’m just an amateur student of the Bible, but I think it has to do with the unveiling of the physical outward glory of God. I say this because that glory was not revealed 24/7 in Jesus until the Mount of Transfiguration, otherwise people would be lying prostrate and trembling with hearts full of repentance before Him wherever He walked, and we know this was not the case.

Furthermore, later in Revelation, John bows before a glorious angel who tells him not to do that. That angel was wrapped in the glory of the Lord, and around his presence shown forth a glory that caused John to immediately bow. Think of the reflective glory of Moses – who was only a human being – whose face (as we discussed last time) would radiate with the glory of God, causing him to have to wear a veil.

I think this glory is revealed to man at the times of God’s own choosing according to His own purposes. For instance, think how Jacob wrestles with the angel who did not appear so glorious, and Abraham hosted three heavenly guests who may or may not have been glorious in appearance. In fact, sometimes in the presence of a wonderous thing, the Lord has to instruct His servants to bow and to take off their sandals (think Moses before the burning bush, and Joshua before the Commander of the Lord’s army in Joshua 5).

But when the Lord does reveal His glory, the effect seems to be nothing short of overwhelming.

And I, Daniel, alone saw the vision, for the men who were with me did not see the vision, but a great trembling fell upon them, and they fled to hide themselves. [8] So I was left alone and saw this great vision, and no strength was left in me. My radiant appearance was fearfully changed, and I retained no strength. [9] Then I heard the sound of his words, and as I heard the sound of his words, I fell on my face in deep sleep with my face to the ground. (Daniel 10:7-9)

And the foundations of the thresholds shook at the voice of him who called, and the house was filled with smoke. [5] And I said: “Woe is me! For I am lost; for I am a man of unclean lips, and I dwell in the midst of a people of unclean lips; for my eyes have seen the King, the LORD of hosts!” (Isaiah 6:4-5)

And after six days Jesus took with him Peter and James, and John his brother, and led them up a high mountain by themselves. [2] And he was transfigured before them, and his face shone like the sun, and his clothes became white as light. [3] And behold, there appeared to them Moses and Elijah, talking with him. [4] And Peter said to Jesus, “Lord, it is good that we are here. If you wish, I will make three tents here, one for you and one for Moses and one for Elijah.” [5] He was still speaking when, behold, a bright cloud overshadowed them, and a voice from the cloud said, “This is my beloved Son, with whom I am well pleased; listen to him.” [6] When the disciples heard this, they fell on their faces and were terrified. [7] But Jesus came and touched them, saying, “Rise, and have no fear.” [8] And when they lifted up their eyes, they saw no one but Jesus only. (Matthew 17:1-8)

Now as he went on his way, he approached Damascus, and suddenly a light from heaven shone around him. [4] And falling to the ground he heard a voice saying to him, “Saul, Saul, why are you persecuting me?” [5] And he said, “Who are you, Lord?” And he said, “I am Jesus, whom you are persecuting. (Acts 9:3-5)

These are just a few instances where God’s terrifying glory was revealed and the reaction from those witnessing it ranged from awe, to silence, to terror, to slumber.

Why do I spend so much time talking about this? Because these are truths about God that we do not naturally carry about with us. They shocked these men because they were truths about God that they didn’t naturally carry around with them!

The point is that our minds are often – and necessarily – crowded with the thoughts of the day. But it is good to take a moment at a verse like this (and there will be many more like it in Revelation) and let the truth of who God is soak into your minds. Realize the wisdom in having a holy reverence for what you cannot see with your eyes. How does this description of God affect your approach to Him when you pray? When you talk?

1:17b -18 But he laid his right hand on me, saying, “Fear not, I am the first and the last, [18] and the living one. I died, and behold I am alive forevermore, and I have the keys of Death and Hades.

Fear Not

The way this sentence begins bears a striking resemblance to the way in which Jesus would address sinners during His earthly ministry. “Fear not” was a mantra that pervaded His speech, and it epitomized His message.

R.C. Sproul remarks on this in the following way:

The prohibition uttered more frequently than any other by our Lord is the command, “Fear not …” He said this so often to His disciples and others He encountered that it almost came to sound like a greeting. Where most people greet others by saying “Hi” or “Hello,” the first words of Jesus very often were “Fear not.”

Why? Perhaps Jesus’ predilection for those words grew out of His acute sense of the thinly veiled fear that grips all who approach the living God. We fear His power, we fear His wrath, and most of all we fear His ultimate rejection.[i]

Here are a few examples of this from the gospels:

While he was still speaking, someone from the ruler’s house came and said, “Your daughter is dead; do not trouble the Teacher any more.” [50] But Jesus on hearing this answered him, “Do not fear; only believe, and she will be well.” (Luke 8:49-50)

Are not two sparrows sold for a penny? And not one of them will fall to the ground apart from your Father. [30] But even the hairs of your head are all numbered. [31] Fear not, therefore; you are of more value than many sparrows. (Matthew 10:29-31) 

John saw enough, and would see more even still, that would be reason to give him great fear. And the tribulation that we face on earth often strikes fear into our heart, yet here in Jesus laying His hand on John saying “fear not.”

Now, the basis for, and the right of Jesus to say this is that He is the “first and the last” and the “living one.” In other words one might paraphrase it this way: Because I am eternal and all powerful and the Lord of all the earth and its history, you have no reason for fear because I will take care of you – I have the power necessary, and it my good purpose for you to do just that.

I Have Conquered Death

George Ladd remarks that in Jewish thought/literature, the idea of holding the “keys” connotes power.[ii] Someone who holds the keys to something has power over that thing – they have control of the situation. 

So it is with Jesus – that He has control over death and over Hell as well. Here Jesus is proclaiming that He is Lord over death.

Interestingly, Jesus predicted that He would conquer death even as a relatively young man. The claim must have sounded odd and out of place, and we know that His disciples at the time baulked at the idea that their Rabbi was going to die.

Here’s what Jesus had said though:

So the Jews said to him, “What sign do you show us for doing these things?” [19] Jesus answered them, “Destroy this temple, and in three days I will raise it up.” [20] The Jews then said, “It has taken forty-six years to build this temple, and will you raise it up in three days?” [21] But he was speaking about the temple of his body. [22] When therefore he was raised from the dead, his disciples remembered that he had said this, and they believed the Scripture and the word that Jesus had spoken. (John 2:18-22)

Not only did Jesus claim that He would be raised Himself, but that He would also raise those who believed in Him:

Martha said to Jesus, “Lord, if you had been here, my brother would not have died. [22] But even now I know that whatever you ask from God, God will give you.” [23] Jesus said to her, “Your brother will rise again.” [24] Martha said to him, “I know that he will rise again in the resurrection on the last day.” [25] Jesus said to her, “I am the resurrection and the life. Whoever believes in me, though he die, yet shall he live, [26] and everyone who lives and believes in me shall never die. Do you believe this?” [27] She said to him, “Yes, Lord; I believe that you are the Christ, the Son of God, who is coming into the world.” (John 11:21-27)

Who else do you know who has this kind of power? Many wish they did, and others live like they don’t care about death one way or another.

Interestingly, the idea of cheating death and the importance of these final matters has even seeped into pop cultural mythology. For example, one of the great precipitors in the fall of Anakin Skywalker was the notion that he could keep his wife from dying. He was lured into believing he could learn to do this from Darth Sideous – aka Emperor Palpatine.

It was this lust for the power to undue affects of death’s hold that drove Anakin toward a total quest for power at all costs – a path that led him ultimately toward embracing an identity of evil – embodied in the persona we know as ‘Darth Vader.’

Ultimately, his quest failed. He couldn’t stop death anymore than he could stop time from marching forward.

Physical death is part of the human experience. No human can escape death’s clutches. The question is, when your body expires, will you live forever with Christ in heaven, or will you live forever in Hell, enduring torment in the absence of the Lord of peace.

1:19-20 Write therefore the things that you have seen, those that are and those that are to take place after this. [20] As for the mystery of the seven stars that you saw in my right hand, and the seven golden lampstands, the seven stars are the angels of the seven churches, and the seven lampstands are the seven churches.

John is told to write what he sees down – reminiscent of other OT prophets who God instructed to do the same (as we mentioned earlier).

Then Jesus begins to solve some of the mystery of what John had already seen. He says that the seven stars in His right hand are the angels of the seven churches. Then He says that the seven lampstands are the seven churches. We’ve already discussed the latter, so let me address the former.

The mystery is still a little unclear (at least to us!) about who these angels are. Are they the pastors of each church? Are they a sort of guardian angel for each church? Problems abound no matter what road you go down. I’d assumed that these represented the pastors of each church until recently when I learned that linguistically this just isn’t very natural or normal – even in prophetic literature, pastors are never referred to as “angels.” Although I think that the stars being the leaders of the churches is perhaps a more tenable option to the stars referring to actual real angels. It’s only a half step away from what is likely the case, which I’ll get to in a moment.

If the stars refer to actual angels, then why is Jesus addressing the messengers of each church and not the church itself? If they are guardian angels and not just messengers, then the same question still stands. Why address angels whose affairs are not addressed in the content of the letters themselves? Hendriksen rightly remarks in his footnotes[iii] about how awkward it would be for the letters to go to spiritual beings who then deliver them somehow to the bishops of these churches. That’s not likely to have happened.

A third possibility perhaps might be the best one. Beale reminds us that the lampstands are taken from Zechariah 4 (as we studied earlier), and that there’s a good possibility that the starts are alluded to in Daniel 12:3:

And many of those who sleep in the dust of the earth shall awake, some to everlasting life, and some to shame and everlasting contempt. [3] And those who are wise shall shine like the brightness of the sky above; and those who turn many to righteousness, like the stars forever and ever. (Daniel 12:2-3)

Furthermore, it seems that in Jewish writings the lampstands and starts are equated as the same subject: the people of God. Therefore, as Beale remarks, “their combination in Revelation 1:20 is natural and may suggest that the ‘stars,’ even if angelic, represent the church’s heavenly existence and the ‘lampstands’ its earthly existence.”[iv]

George Ladd thinks along similar lines, “It is best to understand this as a rather unusual symbol to represent the heavenly or supernatural character of the church.”[v]

Beale’s summary of what we see here is that, “If this background is in mind here in Revelation, then the imagery of the seven lampstands adjacent to Christ and the seven stars evokes the idea that the churches have a position in the heavenly or spiritual temple in the midst of which Christ is ruling and present.”[vi]

This certainly makes sense when we think on and affirm the fact that Christ will certainly build and rule over His kingdom. For His last words on earth were:

And Jesus came and said to them, “All authority in heaven and on earth has been given to me. [19] Go therefore and make disciples of all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit, [20] teaching them to observe all that I have commanded you. And behold, I am with you always, to the end of the age.” (Matthew 28:18-20)

These images are meant to evoke within us both comfort and the realization that because Christ was victorious over the grave, and because we are “in” Christ, we too will be victorious over death and hell. For as Paul says:

For those whom he foreknew he also predestined to be conformed to the image of his Son, in order that he might be the firstborn among many brothers. [30] And those whom he predestined he also called, and those whom he called he also justified, and those whom he justified he also glorified. (Romans 8:29-30)

FOOTNOTES

[i] R.C. Sproul, ‘Fear Not’, Article from Ligonier.com, Ligonier Ministries, http://www.ligonier.org/learn/articles/fear-not/

[ii] Ladd, Pg. 34.

[iii] Hendriksen, Pg. 58.

[iv] Beale, Longer Commentary, Pg. 211.

[v] Ladd, Pg. 35.

[vi] Beale, Longer Commentary, Pg. 211.

Study Notes: Revelation 1:9-16

Here are the notes from today’s lesson Revelation 1:9-16

The main theme in these verses is the character and appearance of the son of man – there are strong ties to Exodus 19, Daniel 7, as well as Daniel 10 (particularly verse 6), and Zechariah 4 (the lampstands).  I hope you enjoy!

1:9 I, John, your brother and partner in the tribulation and the kingdom and the patient endurance that are in Jesus, was on the island called Patmos on account of the word of God and the testimony of Jesus.

Unity in the Kingdom

We have here the obvious beginning of a new section of the text. Now it is John speaking again, and he begins by saying he is a “brother and partner” in their trials – their “tribulation.” He is a partner in both their tribulation and also in the kingdom. If this doesn’t scream, “inaugurated eschatology” I don’t know what does…

John is already enduring tribulation – and he wants them to know that they aren’t alone.

Indeed, John’s humility must have been a great comfort to them. For as John MacArthur says:

John was an apostle, a member of the inner circle of the twelve along with Peter and James, and the human author of a gospel and three epistles. Yet he humbly identified himself simply as “your brother.” He did not write as one impressed with his authority as an apostle, commanding, exhorting, or defining doctrine, but as an eyewitness to the revelation of Jesus Christ that begins to unfold with this vision.[i]

John also reminds them that they are partners, not only in tribulation, but also in “the kingdom.” He is speaking in the present tense, by the way. He is speaking about the kingdom of God, which John considers as already existing and as having been ushered in at our Lord’s resurrection.

Furthermore, he says that he is with them in “patient endurance that are in Jesus.” Endurance that is a fruit of being “in Jesus.” All of these descriptors are modified by this phrase “in Jesus.”

Listen to Beale explain this so clearly:

John and his community are people who even now reign together in Jesus’ kingdom. But this is a kingdom unanticipated by the majority of Jews. The exercise of rule in this kingdom begins and continues only as one faithfully endures tribulation. This is a formula for kingship: faithful endurance through tribulation is the means by which one reigns in the present with Jesus. Believers are not mere subjects in Christ’s kingdom. “Fellow partaker” underscores the active involvement of saints not only enduring tribulation, but also in reigning in the midst of tribulation.[ii]

Hanging Out on Patmos

Next we learn where John is/was when he saw the visions. Most of the commentators seem to think he either wrote part of the vision down on the island, or later afterward.

The island itself wasn’t a very hospitable place. MacArthur describes it as, “a barren, volcanic island in the Aegean Sea, at its extremities about ten miles long and give to six miles wide, located some forty miles offshore from Miletus (a city in Asia Minor about thirty miles south of Ephesus; cf. Acts 20:15-17).”[iii]

Ladd says it was, “a bare, rocky volcanic island with hills rising to about a thousand feet. There are references in Roman literature to support the view that such islands were used for the banishment of political offenders. There is no evidence that John’s exile was any part of a general persecution of the church in either Rome or Asia.”[iv]

Thomas Brooks once used the island to as analogy to the human heart:

Our hearts naturally are like the isle of Patmos, which is so barren of any good, that nothing will grow but in earth that is brought from other places; yet Christ can make them like a watered garden, like a spring of water whose waters fail not.[v]

We don’t know for certain exactly why John is on Patmos, except that it is in connection with His service to our Lord and likely the spread of the gospel.

1:10-11 I was in the Spirit on the Lord’s day, and I heard behind me a loud voice like a trumpet [11] saying, “Write what you see in a book and send it to the seven churches, to Ephesus and to Smyrna and to Pergamum and to Thyatira and to Sardis and to Philadelphia and to Laodicea.”

Lord’s Day

Because of the Lord’s resurrection coming on the first day of the week – Sunday, as we call it now – the people of the early church began to gather in celebration on that day and eat and fellowship together. It is likely that when John refers here to the “Lord’s Day” he is not referring to the scriptural concept of the eschatological “day of the Lord”, but rather to that day which Christ followers had set aside to celebrate their Lord’s resurrection and victory over death and sin.[vi]

That they celebrated the resurrection day was closely tied to their motive to overcome trials. If Jesus overcame, and they were “in” Jesus, then they too could overcome. Jim Hamilton magnificently states that…

Because of the resurrection of Jesus, we can face suffering, imprisonment, testing, and tribulation without fear. Because of the resurrection of Jesus, we can be faithful unto death (cf. 2:20). The resurrection of Jesus guarantees that though we suffer we will not be crushed, though we are tested we will not fail, though we face tribulation we will be preserved, though we die we will rise.[vii]

In the Spirit

Beale notes that John’s use of the phrase “in the Spirit” is similar to Ezekiel’s use of that same phrase to connote a vision from God. He then mentions that behind him he hears a loud trumpet-like voice, which reminds us a little of God’s revelation to Moses. One such example is:

On the morning of the third day there were thunders and lightnings and a thick cloud on the mountain and a very loud trumpet blast, so that all the people in the camp trembled. [17] Then Moses brought the people out of the camp to meet God, and they took their stand at the foot of the mountain. [18] Now Mount Sinai was wrapped in smoke because the LORD had descended on it in fire. The smoke of it went up like the smoke of a kiln, and the whole mountain trembled greatly. [19] And as the sound of the trumpet grew louder and louder, Moses spoke, and God answered him in thunder. [20] The LORD came down on Mount Sinai, to the top of the mountain. And the LORD called Moses to the top of the mountain, and Moses went up. (Exodus 19:16-20)

When God speaks to His prophets in this way, it seems like there is little room for doubting who it is that is speaking! I might just add there that this isn’t the way in which false angels/demons or Satan speaks. He doesn’t have that majestic presence that God does. God alone is ruler and proclaimed as such by all of heaven. His voice is described by Ezekiel in this way:

And behold, the glory of the God of Israel was coming from the east. And the sound of his coming was like the sound of many waters, and the earth shone with his glory. (Ezekiel 43:2)

We’ll see this same language used in just a few more verses (1:15).

Write What You See to the Churches

John is commanded to write what he sees down in a book. Similar to the OT prophets who were often commanded to write down what they had seen (Beale, for example, cites Ex. 17:4; Is. 30:8, Jer. 37:2 – in the LXX[viii] – and so forth), and often those writing contained judgments toward Israel. So the reader who might have studied the OT might have been already catching a hint of what’s to come by way of judgment (cf. Beale).

Now we see that Jesus has asked John to write all the things he is seeing down on a book or scroll to be sent to these seven churches. We’ve spent some time already discussing the churches, the importance of the number seven, and some of the viewpoints surrounding different views on why these specific churches were mentioned.

One unique view is that the order of the churches mentioned here is significant because it corresponds to a specific time frame in history. This is known as the “historist” view. Once again Beale give a nice overview that I find worth citing in the full:

There is apparently no significant to the order in which the different churches are addressed, although some have attempted to say that it foreshadows the church age after John: the spiritual condition of the seven churches prophetically represents seven successive stages in church history. However, there is no indication of such a prophetic intention nor does church history attest to any such pattern. What is likely is that the number “seven” refers to the church universal in both a geographical and temporal sense and that the conclusion of each letter extends its application to all the churches. Therefore, what we find in the letters is potentially relevant for the church of every time and place.[ix]

I won’t here take the time to describe each church and what we know about them, because we’ll get a chance to look at that when we get to each letter specifically.

1:12-13 Then I turned to see the voice that was speaking to me, and on turning I saw seven golden lampstands, [13] and in the midst of the lampstands one like a son of man, clothed with a long robe and with a golden sash around his chest.

Here John turns around and sees the voice and when he does he sees seven golden lampstands. Later we’ll find that those lampstands are the seven churches. We’ll discuss that more again when we talk about verse 20. But let me just quote from Jim Hamilton on this:

The church is not a building but believers who are “living stones” (cf. 1 Peter 2:5). Zechariah’s lampstand, which symbolized the presence of God in the temple, is fulfilled by the seven lampstands of Revelation, which symbolizes God’s presence in the seven churches to whom John writes. Zechariah’s “two sons of oil,” Joshua the high priest and Zerubbabel the royal descendant of David, are fulfilled in Jesus, who stands among the lampstands as God’s presence in his church. Jesus himself fills the offices of High Priest and High King of Israel. The vision of the lampstand and the two olive trees in Zechariah guaranteed that God would empower the rebuilding of the temple. Similarly, John’s vision of Jesus among the lampstands guarantees that God will accomplish his purpose in the building of the Church.[x]

Then he says that in the midst of the lampstands there was “one like a son of man.” When you hear the phrase “son of man” whom do you think of? Jesus. This was Jesus’ own favorite self-designation and it comes from the book of Daniel, which we’ve seen in previous weeks.

Jesus is described as “clothed with a long robe” and with “a golden sash around his chest.”

I was really interested in why He would be described like this, until George Ladd helped point me in the right direction: “this was the garb of the high priest (Ex. 28:4, 39:29). However, prophets could be similarly garbed (Zech. 3:4), so it is not clear whether this is intended to designate specifically our Lord’s high priesthood, or merely the dignity of his person.”[xi]

Beale mentions that the garb He is wearing could indicate a kingly or priestly function, but because of the scene – which seems to be a temple or church-like picture – the likelihood is that its priestly garb.

The overarching idea seems to be that Jesus is both priest and king. The “son of man” reference connotes Daniel 7’s clear royal kingship emphasis, but the garb is priestly it seems. Thus, like the passage in Zechariah 4 that describes the lampstands, there are two olive trees, one is the high priest and the other is the king. Jesus is both, and walks among his people keeping them secure and ensuring that He will finish the work He began. 

1:14-15 The hairs of his head were white, like white wool, like snow. His eyes were like a flame of fire, [15] his feet were like burnished bronze, refined in a furnace, and his voice was like the roar of many waters.

Now I don’t want to “unweave the rainbow”[xii] here, but let’s concisely examine the descriptors used here of Jesus – many of which are taken from either Daniel 7, or Daniel 10.

The passage in Daniel 10 isn’t one we’ve examined yet. The prophet had a terrifying vision of a man, and, as Jim Hamilton puts it, “Daniels vision have to do with the son of man who receives an eternal kingdom, and in Daniel 10:14 Daniel encountered a man from Heaven who told him that he ‘came to make you understand what is to happen to your people in the latter days. For the vision is for days yet to come.’”[xiii]

The description of this man who spoke to Daniel is found in verses 5 and 6:

I lifted up my eyes and looked, and behold, a man clothed in linen, with a belt of fine gold from Uphaz around his waist. [6] His body was like beryl, his face like the appearance of lightning, his eyes like flaming torches, his arms and legs like the gleam of burnished bronze, and the sound of his words like the sound of a multitude. (Daniel 10:5-6)

So John is greatly influenced in his descriptors by the vision of Daniel. Remember that Daniel was told to “seal up” the vision he saw (Daniel 12:4), whereas John is instructed to not seal up the vision (Revelation 22:10). In other words, as Hamilton says, “what was prophesied by Daniel is fulfilled in Revelation.” [xiv]

Now back to Revelation 1, the white hairs on Jesus’ head are also a picture from Daniel, but in Daniel it is the Ancient of Days (the Father) who has the white hair. Jesus, the Son of Man, is now described in this way. For as Ladd says, John used them (the hair) to show that Christ shares eternal existence with the Father.”[xv]

He has eyes that are described as a “flame of fire”, which Beale and others say could symbolize judgment, though Mounce says, “It expresses the penetrating insight of the one who is sovereign, not only over the seven churches, but over the course of history itself.”[xvi]

Ladd sees both ideas in the description of His eyes and says, “We may conclude that it symbolized omniscience combined with holy wrath directed against all that is unholy.”

The “burnished bronze” feet of the Lord which are described as having been “refined in a furnace” could describe the moral purity of Christ.

1:16 In his right hand he held seven stars, from his mouth came a sharp two-edged sword, and his face was like the sun shining in full strength.

The idea of Jesus holding the seven stars in his hand we will come back to in a bit when we look at verse 20.

We read that issuing from the mouth of the Son of Man there is a two-edged sword – and its “sharp.” It’s sharpness connotes effectiveness. This isn’t a dull blade – it will accomplish what it seeks to do:

so shall my word be that goes out from my mouth; it shall not return to me empty, but it shall accomplish that which I purpose, and shall succeed in the thing for which I sent it. (Isaiah 55:11)

This undoubtedly is speaking of the Word of God. Jesus himself is the Word, and his Gospel goes out among the people of this world and conquers their hearts.

Johnson sees an interesting connection between the two reasons why Israel first wanted a king, and the function of Jesus as Warrior and Judge:

But the people refused to obey the voice of Samuel. And they said, “No! But there shall be a king over us, [20] that we also may be like all the nations, and that our king may judge us and go out before us and fight our battles.” (1 Samuel 8:19-20)

Johnson says, “Although Saul failed to demonstrate either wise justice or courage in battle, David exemplified the king as a bold warrior and Solomon, the king as a wise judge. Yet David and everyone in his dynasty fell short of David’s poetic profile of the perfect ruler (2 Samuel 23:1-7) – until Jesus, the Son of Man, who is supremely wise in judgment and fierce in battle.”[xvii]

Lastly, John says that Jesus’ face was “like the sun shining in full strength.” Undoubtedly this is speaking to the magnificent glory of the Lord Jesus.

I couldn’t help but remember the passage in Paul’s second letter to the Corinthians where he speaks of the reflected glory of the Father onto the face of Moses. Moses’ face would just shine for days after meeting with God. So much so, that he had to wear a veil to keep from blinding the people.

Paul makes a connection between the glory which Moses beheld which was fleeting, and that which we behold in the Word of God, which actually causes us to burn brighter with the rays of the Lord’s light. Of course the key verse in the passage is:

And we all, with unveiled face, beholding the glory of the Lord, are being transformed into the same image from one degree of glory to another. For this comes from the Lord who is the Spirit. (2 Corinthians 3:18)

And in a way, I think it’s fitting to end this section thinking of this verse because that’s what we’re doing now. We’re beholding the glory of the Lord as mediated through His word.

Sometimes I’m going to be able to make a direct application – especially with the letters to the churches coming up. We’ll be able to examine those and examine our own lives to make sure we’re living in accordance with God’s Word.

However, there are other times, like today, where we are simply “beholding.” We simply read and admire the glory of the Lord knowing that it isn’t a waste of time to meditate on His character and attributes. In fact, it changes us significantly by having an impact on how we view ourselves, His care for us, and His power and care over all history.

Footnotes

[i] MacArthur, Commentary on Revelation, Volume I, Pg. 40.

[ii] Beale, (the longer commentary) Pg. 201.

[iii] MacArthur, Volume I, Pg. 41.

[iv] Ladd, Pg. 30.

[v] Brooks, ‘Smooth Stones Taken from Ancient Brooks’, Pg.’s 5-6.

[vi] See esp. Ladd Pg. 31, and MacArthur pg. 41 for why the phrasing of this indicates John is speaking of “Sunday” and not the eschatological “day of the Lord.”

[vii] Jim Hamilton, Commentary on Revelation, Pg. 41.

[viii] Beale, the longer commentary, Pg. 203.

[ix] Beale, the longer commentary, Pg. 204.

[x] Hamilton, Pg. 46.

[xi] Ladd, Pg.’s 32-33.

[xii] Mounce, Pg. 78.

[xiii] Hamilton, Pg. 47.

[xiv] Hamilton, Pg. 48.

[xv] Ladd, Pg. 33.

[xvi] Mounce, Pg. 79.

[xvii] Johnson, Pg. 59.

Study Notes: Revelation 1:7-8

Here are my study notes for Revelation 1:7-8.  Only two verses, but a lot of interesting and worthwhile components here to examine. I hope you profit from these short notes.

PJW

1:7 Behold, he is coming with the clouds, and every eye will see him, even those who pierced him, and all tribes of the earth will wail on account of him. Even so. Amen.

I’ve said in recent conversations with friends that Revelation is a study in the character of God. The multifaceted character of God is projected with an illuminocity that is enough to protract our time in the book for a great many months if we are not careful.

Verses seven and eight are just one such example. It’s an important reminder that though the Bible is written for us, it’s primarily about God.

Let’s examine how this is so beginning in verse seven…

The context of the verse is speaking of Jesus, and there are a few OT passages used to describe what we read here. It is a combination of Daniels 7:13, Zechariah 12:10 and perhaps also Genesis 22:18.

First, there is a clear allusion to Daniel 7 where we read about the “son of man” who is “coming in the clouds” (Daniels 7:13).

“I saw in the night visions, and behold, with the clouds of heaven there came one like a son of man, and he came to the Ancient of Days and was presented before him. [14] And to him was given dominion and glory and a kingdom, that all peoples, nations, and languages should serve him; his dominion is an everlasting dominion, which shall not pass away, and his kingdom one that shall not be destroyed. (Daniel 7:13-14)

Johnson says, “Jesus uses Daniel’s wording in the same way, to speak of his resurrection and ascension ‘with the clouds’ to the Father’s right hand, to be invested with universal authority as the victorious Messiah (Mark 8:38, 14:32; Matthew 16:27, 26:64; Luke 9:26; cf. Acts 1:9).”[i]

How would John’s original early church audience have thought about these things? Johnson and Beale are saying that when John’s audience heard certain phrases like “with the clouds” their minds would have thought immediately of Daniel’s prophecy. John knows this, and uses those terms to describe what he’s seeing. Similarly, Jesus knows this (because they are his words in the first place) and uses them to convey his thoughts in a way that would bring certain ideas into the minds of the new testament church.

In modern terms, think of it this way. If I were to begin telling you a story with the words, “A long time ago, in a galaxy far, far away” you would immediately think: Star Wars! Your context and background and framework for understanding everything that proceeded from that point onward would be Star Wars related. Similarly, John uses words that snap us into the mindset of OT prophecy – Daniel, Zechariah, Isaiah, Ezekiel, and so on.

Therefore, understanding these foundation, it seems that this passage is speaking about the second coming of Jesus, which is still future. It speaks of Him coming back in the clouds – we know that He left in the clouds, and the apostles were told He would return the same way:

And while they were gazing into heaven as he went, behold, two men stood by them in white robes, and said, “Men of Galilee, why do you stand looking into heaven? This Jesus, who was taken up from you into heaven, will come in the same way as you saw him go into heaven.” (Acts 1:10-11)

Johnson summarizes well:

Revelation affirms that Jesus has come to the Ancient of Days and been given all authority. His right to open the scroll shows this (Revelation 5). But the statement in Revelation 1:7, “He is coming with the clouds,” is a promise for the future, as the future tense of the verbs (“they will see…they will mourn”) makes clear.

Second, John says that every eye will see this son of man – “even those who pierced him.” We know that to be our Lord, who was pierced for our transgressions (Zech. 12:10 and John 19:37). Zechariah is the key OT passage here:

Him Whom They Have Pierced [10] “And I will pour out on the house of David and the inhabitants of Jerusalem a spirit of grace and pleas for mercy, so that, when they look on me, on him whom they have pierced, they shall mourn for him, as one mourns for an only child, and weep bitterly over him, as one weeps over a firstborn. [11] On that day the mourning in Jerusalem will be as great as the mourning for Hadad-rimmon in the plain of Megiddo. (Zechariah 12:10-11)

Hendriksen is right to say, “The Bible knows nothing about an invisible or secret second coming. Nowhere is this taught. On the contrary, ‘every eye shall see him.’”[ii]

Of course this means that the Jews who crucified Jesus will see that He indeed was and is the Christ. But I don’t think we can limit the awareness to simply the Jews, for the verse is much broader than that – which leads to our third possible reference.

The third reference is a possible allusion to Genesis 22:18. When the text says that, “every eye” will see Him and that “all tribes of the earth will wail on account of him”, it is possible that there is a reference to the Abrahamic promise:

and in your offspring shall all the nations of the earth be blessed, because you have obeyed my voice.” (Genesis 22:18)

In other words, the universal nature of what God is planning to do is clearly marked out in Revelation 1:7, and finds its roots deep in the OT story. God will not withdraw His promises, and He will bring to completion that which He began so long ago.

So to sum it up here, it seems that this verse is speaking of the second coming of Jesus in the heavenly clouds of glory. What we learn is that when He returns it will be made known not only to the Jews, not only to His elect, but to every man, woman and beast on the earth. His resplendent glory will be known to all.

There will be two reactions on that day. The first will be one of fear and “mourning”, as we’ve just read. This mourning is not out of repentance.

Contra Beale (in this case), I’m apt to agree with George Ladd who says this, “However, there is in the book of Revelation no indication of the repentance of the wicked. On the contrary, the judgments of God only serve to confirm the wicked in their wickedness (9:20, 16:9, 11). Probably, we are to understand that Christ is not the object but the occasion of their grief; they wail on account of him because of the terrible judgment which he is to inflict upon them.”

The second reaction will be one of exuberant joy and adoration. It will be a great “YES!” from the souls and hearts and mouths of all His children left on earth.

John takes these truths in, digests them, and says “Even so. Amen.” It is as if with a heavy heart – the heart of an evangelist – that he takes a deep sigh, and says, even though all this will happen, Amen. The “Amen” is the agreement with what he has written, it is the stamp of veracity upon all he has said. Therefore he is agreeing with the Lord in his “amen.” He is saying that despite the millions upon millions who will be headed for Hell, yet he will not question the sovereign plan of the Lord – far from it, in all things he will agree with the Lord, and does so by stating “amen.” May we also respond to our Lord in this way.

1:8 “I am the Alpha and the Omega,” says the Lord God, “who is and who was and who is to come, the Almighty.”

In verse eight we have again another incredible statement about the character of the Lord Jesus. He calls Himself the “Alpha and the Omega” and then, as if to make clear what He was getting at, He says He is, “who is and who was and who is to come, the Almighty.”

The words “Alpha” and “Omega” are the first and last letters in the Greek alphabet. This is a slightly tweaked version of what we find in verse 17, which says, “I am the first and the last.”

There are also parallel passages in the epilogue:

And he said to me, “It is done! I am the Alpha and the Omega, the beginning and the end. To the thirsty I will give from the spring of the water of life without payment. [7] The one who conquers will have this heritage, and I will be his God and he will be my son. [8] But as for the cowardly, the faithless, the detestable, as for murderers, the sexually immoral, sorcerers, idolaters, and all liars, their portion will be in the lake that burns with fire and sulfur, which is the second death.” (Revelation 21:6-8)

I am the Alpha and the Omega, the first and the last, the beginning and the end.” (Revelation 22:13)

Furthermore, Hendriksen points out something really neat, “Notice that the same phrase which in verse 4 described the Father here designates the Son. ‘I and the Father are one’ (John 10:30).”[iii]

And Johnson rightly points out that when God uses this self-designation He does so to 1. Remind us that He is the Lord of history, and that apart from Him there is no God and 2. To remind us that He is powerful (and in control) enough to deliver us from our present tribulation. This OT understanding fits well with His closing words, “the Almighty” – which Ladd likes to say can be translated, “the All-Ruler.”[iv]

We find a few examples of this first way God uses this eternal name in the OT book of Isaiah:

Who stirred up one from the east whom victory meets at every step? He gives up nations before him, so that he tramples kings underfoot; he makes them like dust with his sword, like driven stubble with his bow. [3] He pursues them and passes on safely, by paths his feet have not trod. [4] Who has performed and done this, calling the generations from the beginning? I, the LORD, the first, and with the last; I am he. [5] The coastlands have seen and are afraid; the ends of the earth tremble; they have drawn near and come. [6] Everyone helps his neighbor and says to his brother, “Be strong!” [7] The craftsman strengthens the goldsmith, and he who smooths with the hammer him who strikes the anvil, saying of the soldering, “It is good”; and they strengthen it with nails so that it cannot be moved. (Isaiah 41:2-7)

“Listen to me, O Jacob, and Israel, whom I called! I am he; I am the first, and I am the last. [13] My hand laid the foundation of the earth, and my right hand spread out the heavens; when I call to them, they stand forth together. (Isaiah 48:12-13)

Thus says the LORD, the King of Israel and his Redeemer, the LORD of hosts: “I am the first and I am the last; besides me there is no god. [7] Who is like me? Let him proclaim it. Let him declare and set it before me, since I appointed an ancient people. Let them declare what is to come, and what will happen. [8] Fear not, nor be afraid; have I not told you from of old and declared it? And you are my witnesses! Is there a God besides me? There is no Rock; I know not any.” The Folly of Idolatry [9] All who fashion idols are nothing, and the things they delight in do not profit. Their witnesses neither see nor know, that they may be put to shame. [10] Who fashions a god or casts an idol that is profitable for nothing? [11] Behold, all his companions shall be put to shame, and the craftsmen are only human. Let them all assemble, let them stand forth. They shall be terrified; they shall be put to shame together. (Isaiah 44:6-11)

Johnson says, “All three pairs – Alpha and Omega, beginning and end, first and last – proclaim God’s eternal and invincible rule over history. The idols were not there at the beginning, nor will they last to the end. They did not give the universe its existence, nor can they manipulate its destiny. They cannot be trusted and need not be feared. The Lord is God from start to finish.”[v]

This is also seen in God’s self-disclosure in Exodus 3:14, and in the “I AM” statements of Jesus throughout the Gospel of John. The name, “I AM” sums up the idea we have been discussing here, and tells us that He is eternal and unchanging. Again, Jesus and the Father are One God with the Spirit. They are all One, the great I AM.

This leads to what I mentioned earlier, the second point about this title is that it implies God’s powerful work to save us now and in the end of history. Note what He said to Moses in Exodus 3:

And now, behold, the cry of the people of Israel has come to me, and I have also seen the oppression with which the Egyptians oppress them. (Exodus 3:9)

When He calls Himself the “Almighty” it is not simply to show off His power and strength and reign, though it does this as well, but it is also meant as our comfort. This is what we saw in the Isaiah passages – and it is implied here – namely that God is able to save us now and will save us finally at the consummation of history.

I say save us “now” because if you note in his title He says that He is the Alpha and Omega, and then gives more details, He says He is the one “who is and who was and who is to come.” It is interesting that He begins be saying He is the one “who is.” This seems to be as if to call attention to the fact that He is not simply a transcendent Being who wound up the clock of the universe at the Alpha, and will finally come back at the Omega at the teleos of history.

This is important because He is stating that, “He is” because He is actively involved in history, in our affairs, and is working out His will in and through history until its consummation – so has it always been. He doesn’t say that He is the beginning and the end simply to say He is eternal – but He is also the one “who is” because He “is” involved in the in-between times.

And the nature of His involvement is characterized by His power and His love.

This is eminently practical to us. When we look at these things we cannot help but worship and find great comfort in these words. The same God who spoke to Moses on Horeb is the God who writes to us here saying that He will be with us. And, as if we needed more examples of the amazing consistency of the Godhead and of Scripture, we read the same thing from Jesus in Matthew 28:20 when He says, “I am with you always, to the end of the age.”

To Sum Up

When you add these things together – the Daniel, Zechariah, Genesis passages and the OT roots behind God’s name and everlasting person – you get this overwhelming sense of eternal kingship, lordship, and sovereignty, but also this interment, condescension and providential hand that guides history, events, and the small details of our lives toward a final teleos.

He is the ruler – He is the One who is and was and is to come. He is Lord of history and of the planets and of this planet, but He is also Lord of the details. And that includes the details of your life, and my life. Amen.

Therefore Revelation is a study in the character of the Almighty God. How that character fashions us, our history, and our future. We find comfort in the fact that because He is eternal He knows the future. We find comfort that because He is almighty, He controls the future. We find comfort in that because He “is love”, His eternal control and plan is merciful, and because He is righteous we find comfort that at the end of the day justice will be done and our God’s name will be honored and glorified.

Side Note: I am disappointed to find that the more I talk to laymen about the book of Revelation the more I am impressed with a general ignorance of the book’s purpose. This book is not merely a guide to unraveling the mysteries of the future. Not many specifics are given as to the future that are not somehow general or symbolic, as we shall see. Those whose wrongful desire is to try and ascertain specifics about the coming of this or that sign have misplaced their desires, and their diligence is wasted (in my opinion). I’m not saying there aren’t mysteries to be solved with study and maturity. But what I am saying is that the primary focus of this book is that it provides us an avenue toward understanding that our God is Lord of all. It is an avenue, not of fruitless and vain speculation, but of reverential worship and great comfort to all who believe. Man seems to have a natural proclivity toward trying to “figure it all out.” I would seek for clarity on every single verse, but I would not presume that we’ll ever have it all figured out, and I hope to humbly proceed with God’s help and the wisdom of scholars who’ve gone before me. God help me in this endeavor. Amen.

 

Footnotes

[i] Johnson, Pg. 51.

[ii] Hendriksen, Pg. 54.

[iii] Hendriksen, Pg. 55.

[iv] George Eldon Ladd, ‘A Commentary on the Revelation of John’, Pg. 29.

[v] Johnson, Pg. 54.

Study Notes: Revelation 1:4-6

1:4 John to the seven churches that are in Asia: Grace to you and peace from him who is and who was and who is to come, and from the seven spirits who are before his throne, 

Here John tells us to whom he’s addressing this letter – to the seven churches in Asia. There were more than simply seven churches in Asia (as Voddie Baucham points out), but these might simply be the main churches to whom John has been working/corresponding. In fact, there were many other churches that were equally significant (see Mounce). So we can guess all we want, but I haven’t yet read any convincing argument on why these specific churches would have been picked. It is enough, I believe, that Jesus ordained these letters to be handed down to us today and that He picked these specific churches for His reasons and His glory.

Hendriksen points out that on a map, they form a sort of irregular circle. Ephesus was the closest to John physically, but perhaps also relationally.[i]

I believe (as do others) that its important that the Lord, in His sovereignty, directed these letters written to the number of churches (7) that represent the idea of “fullness” or “completeness” and “perfection” in the Bible. Thereby leading many scholars to believe that while the Lord was certainly speaking to specific churches with specific people during John’s life and in his ministry, He was also speaking the “whole” or “complete” church – the universal church.

Baucham certainly believes this, and Hendriksen says bluntly, “These seven churches represent the entire church throughout this dispensation.” I think of it like this – just because something is used as a figure or symbol doesn’t mean it wasn’t real or had real application in its context. Jesus spoke many words to Pharisees and disciples that had meaning to those people in that context, yet they still hold meaning for us today. The fig tree Jesus cursed was a real fig tree, yet it had greater meaning for many throughout the ages.[ii]

Therefore, while written to specific real churches with real Christians, this letter is still relevant for the universal church, the complete and full church across all geographical boundaries for all time. Just as we still apply the lessons of the gospels and the epistles of Paul to our lives today, so too this letter applies to us today.

He begins with the greeting “grace and peace” and its well that he says “grace” first, for as Beale says in one of his sermons on the text, grace must always precede peace. The greeting is meant as a reminder of the grace they have received by way of the Lord Jesus Christ, and the peace it has brought them not only in this life, but eternally. This greeting is a refreshing way of encouraging the elect and quickly identifying in their minds just exactly who they are and who is writing the letter. This letter is from the Prince of Peace, this letter is from the One who has extended grace to you and saved your lives.

Hendriksen summarizes better than most, “Grace is God’s favor given to those who do not deserve it, pardoning their sins and bestowing upon them the gift of eternal life. Peace, the reflection of the smile of God in the heart of the believer who has been reconciled to God through Jesus Christ, is the result of grace. This grace and this peace are provided by the Father, dispensed by Holy Spirit, and merited for us by the Son.”

Then we are told from whom the message comes. John describes him as “him who is and who was and who is to come.” I love that because it reminds us that what you’re about to read was preordained from before the foundation of the world, is being currently underwritten and guaranteed, and will be upheld until the end of history. The forthcoming letter’s veracity is built upon the enduring character of God. Not only that, the emphasis on the timelessness of God reminds us again of the timelessness of His Word. By prefacing His message in this way He is reminding them that this word – His word – will be relevant from now until the end of time and beyond, for:

The grass withers, the flower fades, but the word of our God will stand forever. (Isaiah 40:8)

As Beale says so well:

The purpose of this revelation is to give the eternal, transhistorical perspective of “the one who is and who was and who is coming,” which can enable them to understand his commandments and so motivate them to obedience (vs.3). Confidence in God’s sovereign guidance of all earthly affairs instills courage to stand strong in the face of difficulties that test faith: this is the point of the OT expression which lie behind “the one who is and who was and who is coming.[iii]

Next we are told that there is another co-author in the Godhead, the “seven spirits who are before his throne.” We’re only four verses into this letter and already we’re going to have to try and understand what is meant by this description. Are there seven literal spirits floating around the throne of God? What is John talking about here? Who are these spirits? What are they?

The key is in the number. The number is used to communicate a concept, an idea. Seven is used to communicate fullness, completeness, as I mentioned earlier. So seven here represents the Holy Spirit in His universal function and mission. 

There is also a close connection between the lampstands we read about in 1:20, and the “seven spirits” as well. We are told in verse 20 that the lampstands represent the church, and Beale sees close ties between verse 4’s “seven spirits” and golden lampstands lit with the fire that stand “before the throne” (before likely meaning a role as messenger):

From the throne came flashes of lightning, and rumblings and peals of thunder, and before the throne were burning seven torches of fire, which are the seven spirits of God (Revelation 4:5).

If we assume the lampstands/torches are the church and the Holy Spirit is normally symbolized by fire (think Pentecost), then it would make sense for John to say here in chapter 4 that “the seven spirits of God” are the “seven torches of fire” – the idea being that we, the lampstands, are empowered by the Spirit.

Adding to this interpretation is the context of the OT. As I mentioned before, the OT is important for understanding these things because the OT speaks in this language a great deal. Look at what Zechariah writes in chapter 4 of his book:

Then the angel who talked with me returned and woke me up, like someone awakened from sleep. He asked me, “What do you see?” I answered, “I see a solid gold lampstand with a bowl at the top and seven lamps on it, with seven channels to the lamps. Also there are two olive trees by it, one on the right of the bowl and the other on its left.” I asked the angel who talked with me, “What are these, my lord?” He answered, “Do you not know what these are?”

“No, my lord,” I replied. So he said to me, “This is the word of the Lord to Zerubbabel: ‘Not by might nor by power, but by my Spirit,’ says the Lord Almighty. (Zechariah 4:1-7)

So we see here that God Himself gives the interpretation of the seven lamps with the fire, and tells us that what is going to be accomplished will not be done by mere might or power (of man, presumably), but by the Spirit. The lamps and the olive trees – which we’ll read about more in chapter 11 – are the people of God filled with His Spirit.

Beale explains the context of Zechariah 4:

In Zachariah’s vision the lampstand represented the second temple (the part representing the whole), for which Zerubbabel had laid the foundation. On either side was an olive tree that provided oil for the lamps. Zechariah interprets the olive trees as ‘the anointed ones who are standing before the Lord of the whole earth’ (4:14), that is, as Joshua the high priest and Zerubbabel.

The main point of this OT chapter (Zechariah 4) was that even though the temple kept getting delayed by outside forces and opposition, God was calling them to endurance and perseverance. It wasn’t going to be done by their strength alone, however, but by “my Spirit.”

The same is true for us today. We live by the power of the Spirit, are led into “all truth” by the Spirit, and are born again by the Spirit. Therefore once again, the OT helps give us grammatical context for what we’re reading here – it also reminds us that God’s character and methodology for interacting with man has been very similar throughout the Bible. His message and His power haven’t changed.

Revelation, as you’ll soon figure out, is going to repeat the same themes over and over again using OT imagery and OT texts to remind the seven churches – and us – that God is faithful. He was faithful in the OT and is faithful today, and will be faithful in the future.

Lastly, it seems to me that in verse 4 and 5 we have a situation where authorship is connoted. Some have said that these seven spirits are angels, because they seem to be messengers standing “before” the throne. While the note about them standing “before” the throne is a great point and may indicate a sort of messenger or implementer of the message, the same could be said of the Holy Spirit. And when you combine the NT principle that it is the Holy Spirit who is speaking through the Word of God, and making it come to life in our hearts – indeed implementing it and leading us into “all truth”, with the idea that there seems to be an authorial (authorship) role given to the seven spirits, I think we have to lean toward these spirits being the one Holy Spirit in His completeness and perfection.

1:5 and from Jesus Christ the faithful witness, the firstborn of the dead, and the ruler of kings on earth. To him who loves us and has freed us from our sins by his blood 

Verse five extols the attributes of Jesus. Both His priesthood (“by his blood”) and His kingship (“the ruler”) are described in dramatic fashion here. Jesus’ kingship is seen as superior to all other kings of the earth.

This phrase is used in Colossians 1:18 and indicates his kingship and rule. “And he is the head of the body, the church. He is the beginning, the firstborn from the dead, that in everything he might be preeminent” (Colossians 1:18).

Mounce is right to note that there is a very rich connection with the Messianic Psalm 89:

And I will make him the firstborn, the highest of the kings of the earth. (Psalm 89:27)

The phrase is also used in connection to our standing with Jesus. Paul says in Romans 8:

For those whom he foreknew he also predestined to be conformed to the image of his Son, in order that he might be the firstborn among many brothers (Romans 8:29) 

Mounce concludes, “As the risen Christ now exercises sovereign control, so also will the faithful share in his reign.”[iv]

We’re also told here that Jesus is the one “who loves us and has freed us from our sins” – this is a description of his priesthood, as I just mentioned, but also it reminds us of our former captivity to sin and death. These topics are going to be important in the coming chapters. You see, what this book will do is paint in great detail the vile nature, the horrid reality, of sin and its end – which is the “second death.”

In other words, those who think very little of their sin now in this life, ought to read the consequence of it, and see how God views their sin. God views sin as an abomination. It is a stench in His nostrils. And those who “dwell on the earth” and “refuse to repent” of their sins will one day be “cast into the lake of fire.” That’s a pretty violent end.

The violence of the end for sinners therefore sets in sharp relief that blessing which we read here – He has “freed us from our sins.”

Lastly, notice that Jesus is described as the “faithful witness” – He bears witness of the truth of the kingdom of God. Although Christ is reigning now and has ushered in His kingdom, it is invisible to the world. They do not see it, nor do they desire to seek it.

Like Christ, we are to be faithful witnesses to the kingdom of God, which leads us to verse six. 

1:6 and made us a kingdom, priests to his God and Father, to him be glory and dominion forever and ever. Amen.

We are to follow Christ in both His kingship and His priesthood. We realize these privileges even now. This is both present and past – He made us and is making us – is the sense of the text. Interestingly, very similar phrasing is found in 5:10 and 20:6. The latter is that passage on the millennium that so many people are familiar with, and it says this:

Blessed and holy is the one who shares in the first resurrection! Over such the second death has no power, but they will be priests of God and of Christ, and they will reign with him for a thousand years. (Revelation 20:6)

Now this only really makes sense if we see the millennium as taking place right now. Before the kingdom of God becomes physical for every eye to see, we have to persevere (see Beale[v]).

To understand our roles as priests we need to look at the OT. Exodus 19 says:

You yourselves have seen what I did to the Egyptians, and how I bore you on eagles’ wings and brought you to myself. Now therefore, if you will indeed obey my voice and keep my covenant, you shall be my treasured possession among all peoples, for all the earth is mine; and you shall be to me a kingdom of priests and a holy nation. These are the words that you shall speak to the people of Israel. (Exodus 19:4-6)

The people of Israel were to be a “kingdom of priests” who would witness to God’s character, as a light to the gentile nations. They were a kingdom of priestly, holy, special people meant to show the surrounding nations what it looked like to be in a right relationship with God.

The priest was a mediator between God and people and that is how is how Israel functioned writ large on the earth. They were to be the go-between between God and the nations. They acted in a kingly way and performed priestly functions.

Today we take on this role in a new way. Peter puts it this way:

But you are a chosen race, a royal priesthood, a holy nation, a people for his own possession, that you may proclaim the excellencies of him who called you out of darkness into his marvelous light (1 Peter 2:9).

Mounce notes:

The early church understood itself to be the true Israel and the inheritors of all the blessings promised to their spiritual predecessors. Corporately they are a kingdom (which stresses their royal standing in connection with the exaltation of Christ as ruler of all earthly kingdom), and individually they are priests of God (which emphasizes their immediate access to God as a result of Christ’s sacrificial death).[vi]

We engage in our priestly responsibilities as mediators of the new covenant. We shine as lights to the world by living lives controlled by love, and sharing the Gospel of the Kingdom of Jesus. As Paul says:

Such is the confidence that we have through Christ toward God. Not that we are sufficient in ourselves to claim anything as coming from us, but our sufficiency is from God, who has made us sufficient to be ministers of a new covenant, not of the letter but of the Spirit. For the letter kills, but the Spirit gives life. (2 Corinthians 3:4-6).

So we are mediators, priests in this this way. We bring people to God, and help them make peace with God and, as Peter says, “we proclaim the excellencies” of God.

This is likely what Jesus had in mind when He announced the new covenant in John 13:

A new commandment I give to you, that you love one another: just as I have loved you, you also are to love one another. By this all people will know that you are my disciples, if you have love for one another.” (John 13:34-35)

Similarly Paul in Ephesians 2:

For we are his workmanship, created in Christ Jesus for good works, which God prepared beforehand, that we should walk in them. (Ephesians 2:10)

Interesting Side Note: I think it’s interesting how John has written in a sort of parallelism here in verse 5 and 5 as it corresponds to the priesthood and kingship issues. Check this out:

A. “the ruler of kings on earth” 1:5b
B. “has freed us from our sins by his blood” 1:5c
A. “and has made us a kingdom” 1:6a
B. “priests to His God and Father” 1:6b

Obviously the A’s go together and so do the B’s. Now, I’m just an amateur theologian, but this was pretty easy to spot. The idea being that we are following in His footsteps – He is making us after Himself, not by our power, but by the power of the Holy Spirit (2 Cor. 3:18).

To What End?

Now what is the purpose of all of this? Why has God made us “priests and kings”? Verse six tells us why: “to him be glory and dominion forever and ever.”

The reason we are mediators for God is for His glory (see Isaiah 43:7). We do this out of love – we are happy to do this (2 Corinthians 5:14). It is the joy of Christ within us, a changed heart (Ezekiel 36:26) that drives us to extend Christ’s grace to others.

You are the light of the world. A city set on a hill cannot be hidden. Nor do people light a lamp and put it under a basket, but on a stand, and it gives light to all in the house. In the same way, let your light shine before others, so that they may see your good works and give glory to your Father who is in heaven. (Matthew 5:14-16).

And, as we’ll see even shortly now, this grace, this witness, will often take place during tribulation.

 

Footnotes

[i] Hendriksen, Pg. 52.

[ii] Obviously we want to be cautious not to confuse application with interpretation though. I have found that in trying to give examples of how to think appropriately about prophetic symbolism it is easy to sometimes shy away from a blunt answer because I want to give examples and help get minds to understand where John is coming from. In doing so, however, I find more trouble sometimes than is warranted! We must always be cautious with these matters.

[iii] Beale, Pg. 187.

[iv] Robert Mounce, The New International Commentary on the New Testament, Revelation, Pg. 71.

[v] Beale, Sermon on Revelation 1:4-9, found here: http://www.lanesvillechurch.org/sermons-audio/970112.mp3

[vi] Mounce, Pg.’s 72-73.

Introduction (and Prologue) to Revelation: Part 6

Below are my notes from yesterday’s teaching in Revelation. These notes include not only the end of my introduction to the book, but also some comments on the first three verses of the book (The prologue).  Enjoy!

PJ

The Outline

I believe that in order to put this book together and understand the flow of this book, there are some things we need to take into consideration regarding the outline of the book.

Different people from different schools of thought have strong opinions about the flow of this book. Johnson divides the book into three[i] major sections:

  1. The Prologue 1:1-8
  2. The Body 1:9-22:9
  3. The Epilogue 22:6-21

John MacArthur[ii], a dispensationalist, outlines the book like this:

  1. The Things which You Have Seen (1:1–20)
  2. The Prologue (1:1–8)
  3. The Vision of the Glorified Christ (1:9–18)
  4. The Apostle’s Commission to Write (1:19, 20)
  5. The Things which Are (2:1–3:22)
  6. The Letter to the Church at Ephesus (2:1–7)
  7. The Letter to the Church at Smyrna (2:8–11)
  8. The Letter to the Church at Pergamos (2:12–17)
  9. The Letter to the Church at Thyatira (2:18–29)
  10. The Letter to the Church at Sardis (3:1–6)
  11. The Letter to the Church at Philadelphia (3:7–13)
  12. The Letter to the Church at Laodicea (3:14–22)

III. The Things which Will Take Place after This (4:1–22:21)

  1. Worship in Heaven (4:1–5:14)
  2. The Great Tribulation (6:1–18:24) This is the majority of the book!
  3. The Return of the King (19:1–21)
  4. The Millennium (20:1–10)
  5. The Great White Throne Judgment (20:11–15)
  6. The Eternal State (21:1–22:21)

MacArthur sees the book as a continuous/progressive chronological outline of the things that are to come. Men like Baptist scholar Jim Hamilton, who are not dispensationalists, also read the book chronologically to some degree.

What is most distinctive about MacArthur’s schema is the fact that so much of the book is set in the future. I think that there are serious issues with this, not the least of which is the fact that if most of the book is set in the future then how would this have meant anything at all to John’s original audience? They were undergoing tremendous persecution, and if all these tribulations are all supposed to be in the future (and we’ll throw in a pre-trib rapture, of course), that’s the equivalent of John saying, “hey I know you’re suffering now, but your great hope is that one day there will be a lot more suffering, and you won’t have to be around for that!” That’s exactly what the message of the pre-trib premil crowd boils down to for us today as well – its only when you actually write it out in its boiled down essence that it begins to sounds illogical.

However, others like Tom Schreiner, William Hedriksen, Voddie Baucham and G.K. Beale (to name a few) see the book as a series of angles looking at the same scene – the time between Christ’s first advent and second advent. This is called “recapitulation”, and can be broken up in a number of ways, generally showing the same scenes in ever increasing drama. They see the bowls, seals, and trumpet judgments as simply different ways to describe the tribulation on earth between Christ’s coming again.

Baucham’s rough outline[iii] is derived from Derek Thomas and goes something like this: 

  1. 1-3 – the introduction, letters to 7 churches
  2. 4-5 – the throne room, the sovereignty of God proclaimed
  3. 6-7 – the seals – judgments which represents issues common to every age
  4. 8-11 – the unfolding trumpets, final which sounds the coming of Christ. These run parallel to the seals judgments.
  5. 12-14 – the scene changes completely and doesn’t flow with continuity from previous chapters. The story is told again from a new vantage point. God is victorious over his enemies.
  6. 15-16 – the Bowl Judgments, Babylon is destroyed (was destroyed in Ch. 14, this retells it from new angle)
  7. 17-19 – The destruction of Babylon the beast and false prophet
  8. 20-22 – God deals with the dragon, new heavens and new earth and eternal fellowship with God enjoyed.

One thing that I’d like to note is that Hendriksen combines sections 2 and 3 and says that chapters 4-7 form one unit. I don’t think one needs to necessarily hold to one or the other very tightly. Baucham, for instance, also posted Hendriksen’s view and outline on his own church website, so I think they pretty much agree on the divisions here for the most part. I appreciate that where there are disagreements on the divisions they aren’t disagreements as to the approach of the book as a series of visions or perspectives, but rather they are disagreements about when one vision ends or how we ought to categorize these visions. This is something we’ll look at closely as we go along in our study because the text will present us with forks in the road that we’ll need to address.

Under the recapitulation view, the tribulation encompasses the entire time between the first and second advent of Christ. Whereas the premillennial view (either one) views these great tribulations as happening during a compressed period of time – 7 literal years – prior to Christ’s 2nd advent, and therefore label this as one long event with the proper name ‘The Tribulation’.

It seems that in order to study the book in a cohesive way one must at least take a viewpoint on how these things should be understood/viewed, otherwise it would be very difficult to understand the big picture of this book.

I will be teaching from the recapitulation perspective that the tribulation passages are meant to describe the trials Christians (and others) will endure between the advents of Christ, thus taking the 7 years to mean the fullness of this interadvental time, and not a future 7 year period of time.

This also means that the judgment scenes and some of the heavenly throne scenes (for example), as giving us different perspectives, or camera angles, on the events that will take place between the advents of our Lord. Each section is not comprehensive of every event of this age – some focus on one thing to the exclusion of another, though the parallels remain constant. Hendricksen also notes that as we get toward the end of the book the judgment scenes continually increase in intensity. So this is the view I think it makes the most sense, and offers the clearest explanation of what we’re looking at, and the way we’ll be moving forward in our study of the book.

Now, some more info on the recapitulation perspective…One thing to note, and that is that Hendriksen’s chapter divisions (mentioned above) are not precise. Beale actually does a little better job showing the nuances in the recapitulation in his work (note especially page 131 of his commentary if you’re interested in checking that out in detail), and he seems to think that a man named Farrer has the most cogent breakdown – this is a bit more precise than the Henriksen one: 1-3, 4-7, 8:1-11:14, 11:15-14:20, 15-18, 19-22.[iv]

It should also be noted that 1. Within these sections there are subsections and sub-points that the author makes, and that 2. There are wider ways to classify the book as a whole (as I did just a bit earlier).

There are MANY nuances to these breakdowns, but the general 7-8 recapitulation divisions seems to hold pretty true across spectrum of theologians of this mindset who are not strict futurists.

The next thing to know about the recapitulation perspective is that it is found in much of the OT prophetic literature from which Revelation draws much of its imagery (much of which is in chiastic form).[v] Daniel, Beale points out, has a structure of “five synonymously parallel visions (chps. 2, 7, 8, 9, 10-12)” and “may be the most influential on the structure of Revelation, since Daniel is used so much in the book and is used to signal the broad structural divisions of the Apocalypse.”

Later in his writing Beale puts numbers to ideas (mostly based on the influence of Daniel, which I mentioned earlier): 1:1-18; 1:19-3:22; 4:1-22:5; 22:6-21. This is a broader structure which can be broken down further, but the point is that 4-22:5 really form an overarching idea – not that they are in the future, but that these visions of judgment and destruction are sequential and similar in form and also “bracketed by the overarching vision of God the Creator and Redeemer.”[vi]

Beale leans on the obvious Daniel allusions and the natural literary breakdown of the book, and has himself settled on a recapitulation view:

If it can be concluded that these Daniel 2 allusions are intentional and draw with them the contextual idea of Daniel 2, then there is a basis for proposing that this provides a significant framework of thought for the whole Apocalypse, that is, end-time judgment of cosmic evil and consequent establishment of the eternal kingdom. As has been seen, this is an inaugurated latter-day thought pervading the visions as well as the letters, which means that the visions should not be understood in an exclusively futuristic manner, but as also including significant sections pertaining to the eschatological past and present. This conclusion is most compatible with a recapitulation view, according to which repeated sections that concern past, present, and future occur throughout the book.[vii]

And, on a more advanced note…if you want to study even further, Beale notes that he and others definitely see the possibility for some chiastic structure in the literary makeup of Revelation. At the center of the structure seems to be 11:19-14:20. Also interestingly, each of the judgment scenes, whether it’s the seals, the trumpets, the bowls or the final judgment of the world (19:11-21:8) there are always three components: prelude, vision, and interlude. These three things repeat over and over again.

Chapter One

Chapter one finds us with John the Apostle on the island of Patmos, in exile “on account of the word of God and the testimony of Jesus” (vs.9). He opens his letter explaining where his message comes from its in this prologue where we’ll begin our verse by verse exposition.

The first three verses have been called the “prologue” and the “introduction” and Beale says that they indicated that “the apocalypse was revealed for the purpose of witness, which results in blessing” and that “The main emphasis here is the blessing obtained from reading the book and hearing it read.”[viii]

1:1-2 The revelation of Jesus Christ, which God gave him to show to his servants the things that must soon take place. He made it known by sending his angel to his servant John, [2] who bore witness to the word of God and to the testimony of Jesus Christ, even to all that he saw.

Here we see the transmission of the message that we’ll be studying. First and foremost it is called “the revelation” of Jesus Christ. This is Jesus’ message, not the invention of John or any other man. Secondly, it is given him by God – presumably the Father and head of the Trinitarian Godhead. Thirdly it is sent via “his angel” and this angel could be the messenger we read about later and this angel communicates it to John. It seems to be a four-step process of communication.

Now there are some significant things to note about the words John uses here in the opening graph of his letter.

First, and most obvious, this word “revelation” or “apocalypse” gets at the heart of the book, and that’s likely why the church has called this John’s Apocalypse from pretty much the beginning of the church onward. “Apocalypse” means to lay bare, it is a disclosure of the truth and a revealing of things previously unknown.[ix]

Another set of important words are those which say “He sent and communicated it (NASB)” or as in the ESV, “He made it known by sending.” The three words “and communicated it” are just one in the Greek sēmainō (pronounced say-my-no) which means “signified” or “to give a sign” or “to indicate.” This original meaning of the word carries with it prophetic/apocalyptic overtones and perhaps signals to us the kind of communication we’ll be getting here.

Apart from the words themselves, Beale sees real importance in the structure of John’s opening. Namely, it looks a whole lot like Daniel’s introduction of the revelation he was given by God to communicate to King Nebuchadnezzar in the second chapter of Daniel. A portion of that passage goes like this:

Daniel answered the king and said, “No wise men, enchanters, magicians, or astrologers can show to the king the mystery that the king has asked, [28] but there is a God in heaven who reveals mysteries, and he has made known to King Nebuchadnezzar what will be in the latter days. Your dream and the visions of your head as you lay in bed are these: [29] To you, O king, as you lay in bed came thoughts of what would be after this, and he who reveals mysteries made known to you what is to be. [30] But as for me, this mystery has been revealed to me, not because of any wisdom that I have more than all the living, but in order that the interpretation may be made known to the king, and that you may know the thoughts of your mind. (Daniel 2:27-30)

Daniel then goes on to describe the great image of a god/idol that is separated into several kinds of metal and representative of different kingdoms of man.

The most important part is that verse 28 I think. You see how se says, “there is a God in heaven who reveals mysteries” and “he had made known”, and it is these phrases that lead scholars like Beale to see clear allusions to Daniel’s literary structure in Revelation 1:1-3 (and other parts as well).

This allusion to Daniel is important because it reveals John’s thought process about how what he has seen fits into the fulfillment timeframe of Daniel. John is trying to tell us that he is picking up where Daniel left off – this revelation is about disclosing in more detail something that formerly had been predicted, but now more details are here for us to understand.

I’m noting this now because we need to put ourselves in John’s shoes here and try to understand John’s own understanding of the context of what he saw. His literary/prophetic context was the OT prophecies. So when he is using phrasing like Daniel, it is likely because he’s saying “I’m picking up where Daniel left off.”

This helps us understand several things. For example, John says that, “God gave him to show to his servants the things that must soon take place” and then says in verse three, “for the time is near.” Understanding John’s own perspective helps us understand what he means by this, and Beale has a great insight into this that is worth quoting in full:

Rev. 1:1 especially should be seen as introducing the main idea of the book, and it is, indeed, understood by many as the title of the whole work. Therefore, if John understands this Danielic allusion in 1:1 in the light of the eschatological context of Daniel 2, then he may be asserting that he conceives of what follows in his book ultimately within the thematic framework of Daniel 2 (and probably its parallel apocalyptic chapters) or at least as closely linked to that framework. The focus of “quickness” and “nearness” in vv 1-3 is primarily on inauguration of prophetic fulfillment and its ongoing aspect, not on nearness of consummated fulfillment, though the latter is secondarily in mind as leading from the former.

Indeed, what follows shows that the beginning of fulfillment and not final fulfillment is the focus. The references to the imminent eschatological period (v 3b), the fact of Christ’s present kingship over the worlds kings (v 5), the initial form of the saints’ kingdom (vv 6, 9), and the following “Son of man” reference (1:7) and vision (vv 13-15), also indicating initial fulfillment of Daniel 7, point strongly to this focus and to the presence of a Danielic frame of reference [x]

This is important for us to understand and really digest. John is saying that these things are upon him – they are not something that will happen in the distant future.

1:3 Blessed is the one who reads aloud the words of this prophecy, and blessed are those who hear, and who keep what is written in it, for the time is near.

I love verse three because it is so very John-like. John has told us that beholding the Word incarnate changed the lives of the disciples. He has told us that when we see Him in the flesh one day, we will be like Him. The reason John gives for this is that “we will see Him as He is.” John Piper and Jonathan Edwards seem to think this has to do with our soul seeing His soul, that somehow we will grasp all of who He is spiritually and that will bring us into total understanding and conformity to who we ought to be (who we were made to be!).

A similar sentiment is uttered here. John says that those who read the words of this book will be blessed and also those who hear it. Surely this is true of all the saints for all time. For every Christian you find that reads the Word of God, you will also find a Christian who is or has been blessed by that reading. It is the Word that changes us (Hebrews 4 and 2 Corinthians 3:18 attest to this) and that change is a blessing from God. To be changed into the image of God is the greatest blessing one can comprehend. God changing our minds and hearts and bringing us into an understanding of who He is, and who we are, and what He wants with us – can you imagine a greater privilege or blessing?

And of course, as we mentioned earlier, the verse ends with the phrase “the time is near.” This indicates that these sayings, these warnings, these truths are upon the apostle. He believes that they are near, they are soon, they are going to be relevant in the very immediate future or present. Of course our minds automatically go to the conclusion that whatever we read next (the rest of the book) must have a great amount of finality, or consummation. But I think there is no great call for holding onto that supposition. John is not saying that the time is “near” for the fulfillment of all things, rather the time is near that we will be seeing and experiencing all the things that are in this book that he’s writing. This makes the book eminently relevant to the early church that he’s writing to, as well as to us today.

Conclusion to the Prologue

The thing that stood out to me most in this prelude to the book of Revelation is the fact that God reveals Himself progressively. He is truly the Lord of history. Abraham didn’t know who would come from his lineage to fulfill the promises God had given him. David didn’t realize that the everlasting kingdom God gave him would be fulfilled in God’s own Son. Noah didn’t realize that his ark symbolized the fortress of freedom that God would one day embody in the personage of Jesus who alone is our raft to safety from the shoals of sin and death. Nor did Daniel know that the eternal kingdom and the Son of man whom he foresaw would be ushered in by a King who would rule all kings, a Lord that would reign over all lords, an eternal God inaugurating an eternal kingdom.

In Revelation we are given a glimpse into the trials and tribulations that we’ll face in this world. We see their nature, their genesis, and the pain they will bring the saints of God. We see the cost of following Jesus. But we also see the triumph of the Lamb and the amazing power He wrought on that dead tree 2,000 years ago. We see that when He triumphed over the grave, He arose and took up His rightful place at the Father’s right hand. The consequences of this for us are simply amazing. This book recounts not only the reality of our trials here on earth, but of the blessings we have in the triumph of Jesus, the Firstborn among many brethren (Romans 8).

Footnotes 

[i] Johnson, pg. 26

[ii] From his commentary (Volume I) on the Book of Revelation, pg. 11.

[iii] From Voddie Baucham sermon May 27, 2012, www.gracefamilybaptist.net. Sometimes you will find that an associate pastor preaches here in his stead, but both hold the same perspective.

[iv] Beale, Pg. 112.

[v] Beale, Pg. 135.

[vi] Beale, Pg. 140.

[vii] Beale, Pg. 141.

[viii] Beale, Pg. 145.

[ix] See the blue letter bible online and the Strong’s concordance: http://www.blueletterbible.org/lang/lexicon/lexicon.cfm?Strongs=G602&t=NASB

 

[x] Beale, Pg. 182.

Introduction to Revelation: Part 5

Today we looked at the classic premil and dispensational premil views of the millennium period spoken of in Revelation 20. I also spoke briefly about the nature of dispensationalism, and its hermeneutic. In my notes (below) I have given a slightly expanded voice to my concerns and why it matters to us today. I just can’t stress enough how important it is that we get our hermeneutics right, and I believe that when we do, our Bibles will lead us away from dispensational views of Revelation, and, well, anything…

Enjoy!

PreMillenialism – Historic

There are two kinds of Premils, the first is historic or “classical” and has been around since the early church fathers (ancients referred to this as chiliasm). The second is dispensational which came into being in the last 200 years. I’ll start with historic premillennialism.

Grudem says:

According to this viewpoint, the present church age will continue until, as it nears the end, a time of great tribulation and suffering comes on the earth. After that time of tribulation at the end of the church age, Christ will return to earth to establish a millennial kingdom….some premillennialists take this to be a literal one thousand years, and others understand it to be a symbolic expression for a long period of time. During this time, Christ will be physically present on earth in his resurrected body, and will reign as King over the entire earth.

John Frame sums up what happens next:

They (the early church fathers who were premil) taught that at the end of the present age, Jesus will come and raise believers to be with him. Then he will reign upon the earth for a thousand years, or some other long period of time. During this time (and not until then), Satan is bound in the bottomless pit. At the end of this time, God will release Satan, and at his instigation some on earth will rebel against Jesus (Revelation 20:3, 7-8). But the Lord will put down the revolt and raise all the dead for final judgment. Then comes the new heavens and new earth.

Therefore, according to this viewpoint, Christians will indeed endure a great time of persecution – they will not be raptured away from this tribulation prior to the Lord’s second coming.

Premillenialsim – Dispensational

The dispensational version of premil belief is “more recent (nineteenth century) and more complicated.”[i]

John Frame sets up the view for us:

The key to understanding the dispensational view is the idea that Jesus actually returns twice, making three times altogether that Jesus comes to earth. His first coming was, of course, his conception in the womb of Mary 2000 years ago. At his second coming, at the end of this age, he comes secretly and raptures believers to be with him. The rapture is described in 1 Thessalonians 4:16-17, where Paul says:

For the Lord himself will descend from heaven with a cry of command, with the voice of an archangel, and with the sound of the trumpet of God. And the dead in Christ will rise first. Then we who are alive, who are left, will be caught up together with them in the clouds to meet the Lord in the air, and so we will always be with the Lord.

This is what you read about or have seen in those Left Behind movies with Kirk Cameron (and now Nicholas Cage). As Wayne Grudem notes, “This return is thought to be a secret return of Christ to take believers out of the world.”[ii]

Then there will be a period of intense tribulation – dispensationalists call this the “Great Tribulation” – which will last 7 literal years. Some hold that the rapture of the church will occur mid-way through the tribulation and that the last 3.5 years of the tribulation (seen to be the worst years) will be avoided by the church.

After the literal 7-year tribulation period Christ will come again (for a third time), this time to usher in His kingdom here on earth.

Grudem says:

During this seven-year period of tribulation, many of the signs that were predicted to precede Christ’s return will be fulfilled. The great ingathering of the fullness of the Jewish people will occur, as they trust Christ as their messiah. In the midst of great suffering there will also be much effective evangelism, especially carried out by the new Jewish Christians. At the end of the tribulation, Christ will then come back with his saints to reign on the earth for 1,000 years. After this millennial period there will be a rebellion, resulting in the final defeat of Satan and his forces, and then will come the resurrection of unbelievers, the last judgment, and the beginning of the eternal state.[iii]

That is their system in a nutshell. But both Frame (leans postmil) and Grudem (a classic premil guy) wisely note that one of the things that makes this form of premil unique is the way they separate the Jews from the church, basically saying that these are two separate and distinct peoples with two separate and distinct futures. To me this is one of the most unbiblical features of the dispensational system.

Grudem additionally notes that, “Another characteristic of pretribulational premillenialism is its insistence on interpreting biblical prophecies ‘literally where possible.’ This especially applies to prophecies in the Old Testament concerning Israel. Those who hold this view argue that those prophecies of God’s future blessing to Israel will yet be fulfilled among the Jewish people themselves; they are not to be ‘spiritualized by finding their fulfillment in the church.’”[iv]

Issues with the Dispensational View

I believe each view has strengths and weaknesses. However, I admit openly that I loathe the dispensational view (not those who believe it, but the view itself) for its absolutely wacky and misleading hermeneutic. I single it out because it’s the most popularized view of the church today, and many in the church don’t know of the alternatives.

The two main distinctives of this view are its futurist bent (i.e. with regard to the millennium and the tribulation period), and its separation between the future destinies of Jews and the Church respectively.

Much of these issues stem from their “literal” hermeneutic. To ignore context, symbolism, figures of speech, allegory, and word pictures is to throw out common sense and discard sensus literalis to the dustbin.

As it concerns the “spiritualizing” of the promises to Israel and those promises being fulfilled (at least partially) in the church. It’s important to realize that our framework for understanding the role of the church with regard to its fulfillment of OT promises is given to us by the Apostle Paul who not only called Christ “Israel” but also called the church the “true Israel of God” (Gal. 6:16) and said that the church – the elect – were Abraham’s offspring In Romans 4 and Romans 9 Paul says that it’s the elect by the promise of God who are Abraham’s offspring). This same apostle also maintained that the Jews would eventually be grafted back in to the church (Romans 11). He used the comparison to a wild olive tree. He never spoke of two trees, only one with the two different branches. Additionally, the Bible doesn’t speak of two brides of Christ, only one – the church. Are we to think that the church is Christ’s bride and that the Jews are, well, just another group hanging around on the outside of the eternal marriage?

There are further consequences – major consequences – not the least of which is a complete misunderstanding of Jeremiah 31:31 and subsequent (and necessary) disregard for Hebrews 8. If this passage only applies to Israel in the future, then the new covenant hasn’t been ushered in, and we aren’t a part of it. You can see how important it is to get the hermeneutic right when we read our Bibles. I will address this momentarily.

Under the dispensational hermeneutic the future will also look, well, very odd. There will be rebellion after Christ has physically reigned on earth for 1,000 years – which means there will still be sin even though Christ will be here on earth – so apparently we’ll have to wait awhile for that problem to be solved. Also, if there’s sin in the millennium, why not death? Sin leads to physical decay and death, so how is this to be dealt with?

Needless to say there are issues with every viewpoint – because we can’t perfectly understand the future and what God has for His people. That’s why He’s God and we’re not! I don’t believe we’re meant to know every detail of the future and how things will exactly play out.

Why this Matters to Us Today 

I mentioned Jeremiah 31:31 above because I believe that dispensationalists inadvertently undervalue the new covenant and the victory Christ achieved on the cross. Again, I don’t think this is their aim, but it’s the consequence of their hermeneutic. This actually really matters to us today because this view of the Bible has consequences for how we view our own salvation, and previous promises that we claim to be ours right now.

In recent years some within their camp have realized there are issues with creating such a dichotomy between the church and Israel. This is why some now call themselves ‘Progressive Dispensationalists’ because they are starting to see that many of these promises made with the “House of Israel” in the OT are actually being fulfilled in the church – chief among them is the promise of a New Covenant. In Jeremiah 31:31-34 we read of a prophecy concerning the new covenant[v] that I’m sure many of you have read or heard before. Listen to the words of Jeremiah, made with the “House of Israel” but now being fulfilled in His church:

“Behold, the days are coming, declares the LORD, when I will make a new covenant with the house of Israel and the house of Judah, [32] not like the covenant that I made with their fathers on the day when I took them by the hand to bring them out of the land of Egypt, my covenant that they broke, though I was their husband, declares the LORD. [33] For this is the covenant that I will make with the house of Israel after those days, declares the LORD: I will put my law within them, and I will write it on their hearts. And I will be their God, and they shall be my people. [34] And no longer shall each one teach his neighbor and each his brother, saying, ‘Know the LORD,’ for they shall all know me, from the least of them to the greatest, declares the LORD. For I will forgive their iniquity, and I will remember their sin no more.” (Jeremiah 31:31-34)

Why am I bringing this up now in the context of our study on Revelation? Because how we view the Bible in Jeremiah (and other books) has an affect on how we view and read Revelation. Having a literalistic hermeneutic not only ruins Revelation, it stultifies and obscures other vital prophetic passages, and the Jeremiah passage is just a great example of this. I said earlier that “hermeneutics matter”, this is just one example of why that is so, and why I want to caution anyone who holds to a dispensational view of this book.

 

Footnotes 

[i] Frame, Systematic Theology, Pg. 1089

[ii] Grudem, Systematic Theology, Pg.’s 1112-1113

[iii] Grudem, Pg. 1115

[iv] Grudem, Pg. 1116

[v] Bruce Ware is in this camp and in his Systematic Theology I lectures at SBTS he gives the Jeremiah 31:31-34 passage as one of the glaring passages which simply can’t be gotten around.